CDM Contribution Review Working Group - June 9th, 2026

[eteridvalishvili]

CDM Contribution Review Working Group Minutes

Meeting Host: Chris Rayner, ISLA

Date

June 9th, 2026 - 10 am EST / 3 pm BST.

Untracked attendees

• Fullname, Affiliation, (optional) GitHub username

Meeting notices

• FINOS Project leads are responsible for observing the FINOS guidelines for running project meetings. Project maintainers can find additional resources in the FINOS Maintainers Cheatsheet.

• All participants in FINOS project meetings are subject to the LF Antitrust Policy, the FINOS Community Code of Conduct and all other FINOS policies.

• FINOS meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of FINOS and the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws. Please contact legal@finos.org with any questions.

• FINOS project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the FINOS team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.

Agenda

• Convene & roll call (5mins)
• Display FINOS Antitrust Policy summary slide
• Review Meeting Notices (see above)
• Approve past meeting minutes
  • CDM Contribution Review Working Group - May 26th, 2026 #4705
• Releases
  • Milestones: https://github.com/finos/common-domain-model/milestones
• CRWG Kanban Board: CDM CRWG
  • Review Approved (10mins)
  • Review Follow-up (10mins)
  • Review Current (20mins)
• AOB, Q&A & Adjourn (5mins)

Meeting Minutes

Action Items

Join Zoom Meeting

Join Zoom Meeting:
https://zoom-lfx.platform.linuxfoundation.org/meeting/94584131804?password=b7edff0a-9cc6-426f-b0d9-28eb4fb0de71

Register to the meeting series to receive an invitation:
https://zoom-lfx.platform.linuxfoundation.org/meeting/94584131804?password=b7edff0a-9cc6-426f-b0d9-28eb4fb0de71&invite=true

[lolabeis]

Leo Labeis / REGnosys

[chrisisla]

Chris / ISLA

[hugohills-regnosys]

Hugo Hills / REGnosys

[dschwartznyc]

Dan Schwartz / FT Advisory

[ReleaseManagement-BP]

Ben Page / REGnosys

[ReleaseManagement-BP]

State of the board pre-call

[ReleaseManagement-BP]

State of the board - post-call

[ReleaseManagement-BP]

Actions from the meeting:

ID	New State	FOLLOWUP
#4486	PR Ready	Adrian has been away, and conversations have been had between Chris and Oscar
#3969	PR Ready	Comments added by @aantao-isda , java implementation versus native CDM implementation. @aantao-isda does not see the difference in his proposal since it is implemented various places in the code. If a native implementation was introduced, all the functions on the issue would need to be adjusted. @chrisisla agreed on this, @mgratacos disagreed, and so further conversations need to be had.
#4759	PR Ready	Agreed that this should be moved forward since there is approval from two maintainers
#4539	PR Ready	Should be merged as soon as possible once 4759 is merged. To be assigned to the 3 associations to review
#4641	PR Ready	To be assigned to @chrisisla  to review once it has been reviewed internally
#4165	Approved	To be left in approved whilst the sub-issues are closed off
#4591	Approved	Expectation issues that are taking exceptionally long, @lukebanas  to speak to @lagarciath  and @BENP-REGNOSYS  to speak to @PayalKhanna to have this resolved. Update since call, has been resolved, with @chrisisla to review and approve
#4628	Approved	To go through the TAWG on Thursday, and then this can issue can be closed
#4746	Approved	Awaiting @davidalk  to complete his PR before this can go ahead to maintainers to review, suggested @manel-martos as well as @chrisisla . @lolabeis  confirmed with @hugohills-regnosys  that this is not a backward-incompatible change, and @hugohills-regnosys explained the transitionary release of keeping old and new in CDM 6 and 7, and to have only the new serialiser in CDM 8. @lolabeis  suggested as soon as we spin off CDM 8 Dev, we deprecate the old serialiser. No objections
#4109	Approv ed	Further work to be done since the review
#2213	Follow-up	Discussed, @tomhealey-icma was not available on the call to discuss this. His current PR needs to change, and @lolabeis has suggested the solution, which needs to be implemented by Monday
#4601	Follow-up	Discussed. @AkashP-REGnosys explained the approach, to add an addition attribute to populate the new quantity in the price schedules. This will not be backwards-incompatible as the price quantity and schedule is 0..1. This is true in payout, but not in tradelot. @AkashP-REGnosys to walkthrough the solution with @chrisisla and @aantao-isda
#4816	Approved	Qualification mechanism that looks at 'economicterms', which points to functions that qualify what those 'economicterms' describes. This change proposes to remove 'productQualifier', which is the same as the value, so the value will be used for this, to tell the difference between stamped on qualifications and calculated ones. @chrisisla  asked whether calculated is the right name for boolean, @hugohills-regnosys agreed and asked for suggestions. Suggestions can be given before the PR is reviewed and merged
#4774	Follow-up	Proposed change was brought to the group. @hugohills  noted that currently gets fpml functions and adds to contract formation. But as name suggests it should be attached to an execution event. Suggested that this should be followed up on and discussed further. @mgratacos , @lagarciath , @lolabeis  and @hugohills  to discuss this further
#4794	Approved	Bug was discussed, and said if it is a transferrable product, this is where  partyrole should be mandatory. Adding a comment, approving this, and Leo to add a comment on next steps forward
#4784	Current	The @finos/cdm-maintainers  to review and offer their comments for this to move forward offline
#4791	Current	The @finos/cdm-maintainers  to review and offer their comments for this to move forward offline
#4615	Current	The @finos/cdm-maintainers  to review and offer their comments for this to move forward offline