fix: correct the API base url used to call cancel push in admin UI

[kriswest]

resolves #1384

Fixes a regression in the admin UI relating to the cancel push button by correcting the API URL base used to call the cancel push in admin UI, which was broken during the TS refactor.

Additionally, ignores the .data, .remote and .tmp folders in the vite config as I noted that data writes into these folders was causing the vite to reload the admin unnecessarily.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0 canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	22afab2
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0/deploys/6989b0f96e66b60008bc7076

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package	Version	Score	Details
npm/diff	4.0.4	🟢 3.4	Details Check Score Reason Dangerous-Workflow ⚠️ -1 no workflows found Packaging ⚠️ -1 packaging workflow not detected Maintained 🟢 10 9 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 Code-Review ⚠️ 1 Found 4/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1 Binary-Artifacts 🟢 10 no binaries found in the repo Token-Permissions ⚠️ -1 No tokens found Pinned-Dependencies ⚠️ -1 no dependencies found CII-Best-Practices ⚠️ 0 no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected Security-Policy ⚠️ 0 security policy file not detected Fuzzing ⚠️ 0 project is not fuzzed License 🟢 10 license file detected Signed-Releases ⚠️ -1 no releases found Branch-Protection ⚠️ 0 branch protection not enabled on development/release branches Vulnerabilities ⚠️ 2 8 existing vulnerabilities detected SAST ⚠️ 0 SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0

Scanned Files

• package-lock.json

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.34%. Comparing base (2452f10) to head (22afab2).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1394   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.34%   81.34%           
=======================================
  Files          65       65           
  Lines        4648     4648           
  Branches      792      792           
=======================================
  Hits         3781     3781           
  Misses        852      852           
  Partials       15       15           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[jescalada]

LGTM! Just wondering if we ought to standardize these "Base URLs" a bit more since we have some places using getBaseUrl which is the same except that it doesn't include the API version...

[kriswest]

LGTM! Just wondering if we ought to standardize these "Base URLs" a bit more since we have some places using getBaseUrl which is the same except that it doesn't include the API version...

Might be a docs issue? getBaseUrl is the server base (root URL), while apiV1Base is the API base under that...

[jescalada]

Just double-checked that one, and indeed the getApiV1BaseUrl function is building the URL from getBaseUrl 😃

It seems all calls to /api/auth endpoints are using getBaseUrl directly, and the others are using apiV1Base. I understand we're deliberately keeping the auth endpoints and the business logic endpoints separate - it's just not entirely obvious why we need different functions for each one.