Skip to content

Conversation

@paulb777
Copy link
Member

Fix #15372

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

@paulb777
Copy link
Member Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses an issue where errors from AppCheck token retrieval were being ignored. Instead of continuing with a placeholder token, the code now properly propagates the error, which is a more robust and safer approach. The changes are well-implemented in both OAuthProvider and PhoneAuthProvider. The addition of new unit tests to cover these error scenarios is excellent, ensuring the fix is verified. I've added a couple of minor suggestions in the test files to improve maintainability.

func testGetCredentialWithUIDelegateWithAppCheckError() throws {
let expectation = self.expectation(description: "App Check error propagated")
let fakeAppCheck = FakeAppCheck()
let expectedError = NSError(domain: "appCheckError", code: -1)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

low

For improved maintainability and to avoid magic strings, consider defining "appCheckError" and -1 as private constants at the top of the OAuthProviderTests class. This would align with the existing practice for other test constants in this file.


func testVerifyPhoneNumberWithAppCheckError() async throws {
let fakeAppCheck = FakeAppCheck()
let expectedError = NSError(domain: "appCheckError", code: -1)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

low

For improved maintainability and to avoid magic strings, consider defining "appCheckError" and -1 as private constants at the top of the PhoneAuthProviderTests class. This makes the test code cleaner and easier to manage if these values are reused.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

App Check Error: Code 17999

2 participants