Skip to content

Conversation

@taeold
Copy link
Contributor

@taeold taeold commented Sep 3, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @taeold, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug in the tracking of runtime configuration usage. The change ensures that a specific analytics metric accurately captures whether non-default runtime configurations are present, improving data integrity for reporting purposes.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Corrected an issue where the usage of runtime configuration was not being accurately tracked, specifically for the has_runtime_config GA4 metric.
  • Metric Accuracy: Implemented logic to ensure the has_runtime_config metric correctly reflects the presence of legacy runtime configuration keys (any keys other than the default 'firebase').
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces tracking for the use of legacy runtime configurations. A new property, hasRuntimeConfig, is added to the deployment context. This property is set to true if any runtime configuration keys other than the default 'firebase' key are present. This is then used for GA4 analytics to monitor the usage of this legacy feature. The implementation is clear, correct, and consistent with similar checks elsewhere in the codebase. The change is well-contained and looks good.

@taeold taeold changed the title fix: fix bug where use of runtime config was not being tracked correctly fix: fix GA4 under-reporting of Functions runtime config usage by restoring has_runtime_config tracking during deploy. Sep 3, 2025
@taeold taeold requested a review from inlined September 3, 2025 02:37
@taeold taeold enabled auto-merge (squash) September 3, 2025 16:37
@taeold taeold merged commit 08f79fd into master Sep 3, 2025
48 checks passed
@taeold taeold deleted the dl-track-rc-use branch September 3, 2025 16:54
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Approved [PR] to Done in [Cloud] Extensions + Functions Sep 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants