Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @yesudeep, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
4854508 to
4b117b9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request enhances the release kit by adding support for continuous releases, particularly for Gradle projects. The changes include more robust version parsing from various Gradle files like gradle.properties and libs.versions.toml, and improved discovery of Gradle projects. Additionally, support for Bazel has been initiated. The new test file for Gradle-specific features is comprehensive and well-written. My review includes a few suggestions to improve the robustness of file parsing by using a dedicated library (tomlkit) for TOML files and by making regex patterns more resilient to comments in property files. These changes will help prevent potential bugs with different but valid file formats.
4b117b9 to
693c9bd
Compare
5c7950f to
2558f7d
Compare
014dfdb to
3f862d8
Compare
f52d0b9 to
cd8d1dc
Compare
edf06de to
66e221c
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This is an impressive and extensive pull request that significantly enhances releasekit with a wide range of features for continuous releases, security, and multi-ecosystem support. The introduction of a programmatic API, a comprehensive validation framework, and support for changesets, CalVer, and release channels are all excellent additions. The refactoring of the GitHub Actions workflows to use a reusable composite action is a major improvement for maintainability and usability. The code is well-structured and the new documentation is thorough.
I have one critical security concern regarding command argument injection in a new utility script, and a minor comment about a misleading code comment. Other than that, the changes look solid.
1adc44a to
fa2a3e7
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This is a massive and impressive pull request that transforms releasekit into a comprehensive, multi-ecosystem release orchestration tool. The changes introduce a wide array of features for continuous releases, security compliance (SLSA, Sigstore, SBOMs), and operational robustness, including one-click rollbacks and detailed health checks. The addition of extensive documentation, a programmatic API, and a reusable GitHub Action are all excellent improvements. The overall quality of the code is very high. I have only found a couple of minor issues to address.
fa2a3e7 to
fc2ec70
Compare
fc2ec70 to
ed5dfb9
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This is a massive and impressive PR that transforms ReleaseKit into a full-featured, multi-ecosystem release orchestrator with strong supply-chain security capabilities. The changes are well-structured, and the new features are extensively documented. The use of a composite action simplifies CI workflows significantly. My review focuses on a couple of minor improvements in the CI workflow implementation for better robustness and maintainability.
Rationale: This PR adds continuous release infrastructure to releasekit, including provenance generation, security insights, attestations, compliance checks, and scheduler functionality. Changes: - Add SLSA provenance generation (provenance.py) - Add security insights YAML generation (security_insights.py) - Add attestation verification backends - Add compliance and preflight checks - Add release scheduler with cron support - Add inline import fixer script (bin/fix_inline_imports.py) - Fix ty type errors: guard ast end_lineno (can be None) - Fix F811: remove redundant has_oidc_credential import - Fix lazy yaml import for proper JSON fallback path - Add noqa comments for intentional subprocess usage in fixer scripts
ed5dfb9 to
10d02c1
Compare
feat(releasekit): supply-chain security, multi-ecosystem orchestration, and CI hardening
This PR transforms ReleaseKit from a Python-focused publish tool into a
comprehensive, multi-ecosystem release orchestrator with full supply-chain
security capabilities.
All ${{ inputs.* }} interpolation in CI workflow run: blocks is replaced
with env: var indirection to prevent GitHub Actions script injection (a
Critical-severity vulnerability). New modules add SLSA v1.0 provenance
generation, Sigstore keyless signing, PEP 740 attestations, CycloneDX/SPDX
SBOM generation, OSV vulnerability scanning, OpenSSF Scorecard integration,
and configurable trust/approval gates.
CI & Security Hardening
New Modules
Validation Backend (backends/validation/)
Reusable Composite Action
Documentation
Other Changes
Testing