Skip to content

Conversation

@stepansergeevitch
Copy link
Contributor

Some minor ci improvements before documenting:

  • Reuse code-check in nightly
  • Splitted python-app workflow into separate pieces

Copy link
Contributor

@ptiurin ptiurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the idea of splitting unit tests and code check out. Though maybe we should have a generic CI workflow that unifies those, for clarity. This way we'd have a single workflow with several checks on PR e.g.

CI/Code style -- SUCCESS
CI/Unit tests -- SUCCESS
CI/PR Title -- FAIL

Similar to nightly.yml

jobs:
  code-style:
    uses: .../code-style.yml
  unit-tests:
    uses: .../unit-tests.yml
  pr-check:
    uses: jef/conventional-commits-pr-action@v1.0.0. (since there's no point in moving it out)

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Copy link
Contributor

@ptiurin ptiurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch merged commit ffb67a1 into main Dec 13, 2021
@stepansergeevitch stepansergeevitch deleted the reuse_code_check branch December 13, 2021 12:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants