Skip to content

add order type in trades response#115

Merged
burhanuddin03 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
add-ordertype-in-trades-response
May 27, 2025
Merged

add order type in trades response#115
burhanuddin03 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
add-ordertype-in-trades-response

Conversation

@burhanuddin03
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • add order type in trades response

@burhanuddin03 burhanuddin03 requested a review from a team May 27, 2025 23:39
Comment thread resources/common.yaml
type: string
description: Order hash.
orderType:
$ref: "#/components/schemas/OrderType"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have we updated ADS, EVS and WS?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ADS is updated. Do we also need to update EVS and WS?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am gonna merge this as Onur is blocked. Will see what needs to be done in EVS and WS.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, please see search.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should be ok, it’s an optional field, so WS or EVS should not break until we update them

@burhanuddin03 burhanuddin03 merged commit 4ed5351 into main May 27, 2025
@burhanuddin03 burhanuddin03 deleted the add-ordertype-in-trades-response branch May 27, 2025 23:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants