-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
feat: add Azure vTPM certificate verification during TDX attestation #47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
MoeMahhouk
wants to merge
11
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
moe-vtpm-certificate-verification
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+332
−7
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
291f8aa
add boiler code for Azure vTPM certificate verification
MoeMahhouk 68a4081
feat: add the required certificates for TDX vTPM
MoeMahhouk d71c7f7
remove unnecessary downloading intermediate CA certs
MoeMahhouk af84a82
refactor and code refinement
MoeMahhouk fc395a7
remove debug logs
MoeMahhouk 5fcccbd
add feature flag for the vTPM certificate verification
MoeMahhouk cbc192f
avoid failing when attempting to read the vtpm certificate data
MoeMahhouk 0fc04e3
chore: code refactoring
MoeMahhouk 4b7b558
make new AkCert field optional for backward compatibility
MoeMahhouk f370479
add edge case handling
MoeMahhouk 679eadb
Merge branch 'main' into moe-vtpm-certificate-verification
MoeMahhouk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We dont return an error here on purpose to allow backward compatibility as well as leave it up to the validator to handle this.
If the validator wants to only check the attestation quote, then it would still pass. If the validator wants to also verify certificates, then this will be checked accordingly