Skip to content

License ambiguity #4

@TheButlah

Description

@TheButlah

Hi, the README says:

This crate is dual-licensed under the MIT and GPL 3.0 (or any later version) licenses. You can choose between one of them if you use this crate.

SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT OR GPL-3.0-or-later

But the repo has LICENSE-APACHE and LICENSE-MIT

Can you update the repo to clarify the license? In case its helpful, you may want to use something like this in your README, which is based on how bevy does it. I think its slightly more clear what the license is this way.

## License

Unless otherwise specified, all code in this repository is dual-licensed under
either:

- MIT License ([LICENSE-MIT](LICENSE-MIT))
- Apache License, Version 2.0 ([LICENSE-APACHE](LICENSE-APACHE))

at your option. This means you can select the license you prefer!

Any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the work by you, shall be
dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.

FWIW: MIT OR Apache-2.0 is the more common option in the rust ecosystem

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions