Skip to content

Conversation

@MrPibody7
Copy link
Contributor

Multiline Parser flush_timeout does not have a default value. gh-595

… no default

Signed-off-by: Enrique Sibaja Pastrana <enrique@calyptia.com>
@MrPibody7 MrPibody7 requested a review from lecaros October 13, 2023 23:03
Signed-off-by: Enrique Sibaja Pastrana <enrique@calyptia.com>
| parser | <p>Name of a pre-defined parser that must be applied to the incoming content before applying the regex rule. If no parser is defined, it's assumed that's a raw text and not a structured message. </p><p></p><p>Note: when a parser is applied to a raw text, then the regex is applied against a specific key of the structured message by using the <code>key_content</code> configuration property (see below).</p> | |
| key_content | For an incoming structured message, specify the key that contains the data that should be processed by the regular expression and possibly concatenated. | |
| flush_timeout | Timeout in milliseconds to flush a non-terminated multiline buffer. Default is set to 5 seconds. | 5s |
| flush_timeout | Timeout in milliseconds to flush a non-terminated multiline buffer. The minimum value is 500 milliseconds. | |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the default?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ping @MrPibody7

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ping @MrPibody7

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ping @MrPibody7

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ping @MrPibody7

@lecaros lecaros removed their request for review February 22, 2024 14:45
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label May 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Aug 31, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Nov 29, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Mar 18, 2025
@lecaros lecaros requested review from a team as code owners March 25, 2025 14:34
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jun 24, 2025
@lecaros lecaros added waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes conflict Waiting on conflict to be resolved by contributor and removed Stale labels Jun 24, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 23, 2025
Signed-off-by: Lynette  Miles <6818907+esmerel@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Sep 24, 2025
@eschabell eschabell self-assigned this Oct 21, 2025
@eschabell
Copy link
Collaborator

@MrPibody7 merging this PR, appreciate the patience.

@eschabell eschabell removed waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes conflict Waiting on conflict to be resolved by contributor labels Oct 21, 2025
@eschabell eschabell self-requested a review October 21, 2025 14:04
Copy link
Collaborator

@eschabell eschabell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed and approved.

@eschabell eschabell merged commit 0f3aab6 into master Oct 21, 2025
5 checks passed
@eschabell eschabell deleted the mltparser-flush-timeout-no-dflt branch October 21, 2025 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants