Skip to content

[DISCUSSION] Version and package naming for AspNet Core MVC 1 support #28

@kevinkuszyk

Description

@kevinkuszyk

I'd like to get some feedback on naming and version strategy for AspNet Core MVC 1 support.

Historically we have had separate packages for each version of MVC we support. The reasons for this are:

  1. We didn't support testing all features of MVC so it didn't make sense to call it a 1.0 product.
  2. Some users had difficulty with binding redirects and constraining package versions.

Moving forward I am thinking about maintaining one FluentAssertions.AspNetCore.Mvc package and resetting it's version number to 1.0. It's major version would be pegged to the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc package, so that when they introduce new / breaking changes at v2 FluentAssertions.AspNetCore.Mvc would also increase to v2.

See: aspnet/Home#1255

Thoughts?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions