fix(security): Storage limits should be enforced in test/gha-e2e/jindo/job.yaml.#5335
Conversation
…/job.yaml. Signed-off-by: JiGuoDing <485204300@qq.com>
Summary of ChangesHello @JiGuoDing, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a reported security vulnerability by implementing explicit ephemeral storage limits for a Kubernetes Job used in the test environment. By setting a '5Gi' limit on the 'busybox' container, the change ensures that the job's resource consumption is properly constrained, thereby enhancing the stability and security of the test infrastructure. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses a security finding by enforcing an ephemeral storage limit in test/gha-e2e/jindo/job.yaml. The change is a good step towards hardening resource usage. My review includes a comment on the change, pointing out that a similar Job definition in a Helm chart (charts/fluid-dataloader/jindo/templates/job.yaml) is also missing resource limits. I've recommended addressing this to ensure consistent security across the project.
| resources: | ||
| limits: | ||
| ephemeral-storage: "5Gi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This change correctly adds the storage limit, addressing the security concern. However, the same potential issue exists elsewhere. The Helm chart at charts/fluid-dataloader/jindo/templates/job.yaml also defines a Job but does not set any resource limits for its container. To ensure consistent security hardening and prevent potential resource exhaustion, it is highly recommended to add resource limits there as well. For Helm charts, it's best practice to make these limits configurable via values.yaml.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5335 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 56.97% 56.96% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 442 442
Lines 30529 30529
==========================================
- Hits 17393 17390 -3
- Misses 11521 11523 +2
- Partials 1615 1616 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: RongGu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
JiGuoDing
changed the title
2 participants
…/job.yaml.
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
This PR addresses the security finding “Storage limits should be enforced in test/gha-e2e/jindo/job.yaml”.
The code below demonstrates how to securely configure a Kubernetes Job with constrained resource usage by explicitly setting:
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
fixes #5333
Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Run the test setup to see if there still remain code scanning alerts.
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews