Skip to content

fix(security): Memory limits should be enforced in test/gha-e2e/juicefs/write_job.yaml.#5365

Merged
fluid-e2e-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intofluid-cloudnative:masterfrom
JiGuoDing:fix_security
Dec 1, 2025
Merged

fix(security): Memory limits should be enforced in test/gha-e2e/juicefs/write_job.yaml.#5365
fluid-e2e-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intofluid-cloudnative:masterfrom
JiGuoDing:fix_security

Conversation

@JiGuoDing
Copy link
Collaborator

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

This PR addresses the security finding “Memory limits should be enforced in test/gha-e2e/juicefs/write_job.yaml”.

The code below demonstrates how to securely configure a Kubernetes Job with constrained resource usage by explicitly setting:

resources:
  limits:
    memory: "512Mi"

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

fixes #5364

Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Run the test setup to see if there still remain code scanning alerts.

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

…fs/write_job.yaml.

Signed-off-by: JiGuoDing <485204300@qq.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @JiGuoDing, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request implements a crucial security enhancement by introducing a memory limit to a Kubernetes Job definition within the end-to-end test suite. The change ensures that the write_job.yaml adheres to resource constraints, mitigating risks associated with unconstrained memory usage and bolstering the stability and security of the test environment.

Highlights

  • Security Fix: Addressed a security finding by enforcing memory limits in the write_job.yaml Kubernetes configuration.
  • Resource Management: A memory limit of "512Mi" has been explicitly set for the test job to prevent potential resource exhaustion.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses the security finding by adding a memory limit to the write_job.yaml. This is a good improvement. I've added one suggestion to further enhance resource management for this job by also including CPU limits and resource requests, which is a Kubernetes best practice. You might consider applying a similar change to read_job.yaml for consistency across the test jobs.

Comment on lines 19 to +22
resources:
limits:
ephemeral-storage: "5Gi"
memory: "512Mi"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While adding a memory limit is a great step for security and resource management, it's also a best practice to define CPU limits, as well as both CPU and memory requests. This ensures more predictable performance and better scheduling by Kubernetes. For a simple job like this, the requests can be small.

        resources:
          limits:
            ephemeral-storage: "5Gi"
            memory: "512Mi"
            cpu: "500m"
          requests:
            memory: "64Mi"
            cpu: "100m"

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.66%. Comparing base (3cfcfb5) to head (9119198).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5365   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.66%   57.66%           
=======================================
  Files         446      446           
  Lines       30931    30931           
=======================================
  Hits        17835    17835           
  Misses      11477    11477           
  Partials     1619     1619           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@RongGu RongGu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Dec 1, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: RongGu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@fluid-e2e-bot fluid-e2e-bot bot merged commit 6421d48 into fluid-cloudnative:master Dec 1, 2025
18 checks passed
@JiGuoDing JiGuoDing deleted the fix_security branch December 11, 2025 04:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Memory limits should be enforced in test/gha-e2e/juicefs/write_job.yaml.

2 participants