fix(security): Memory limits should be enforced in test/gha-e2e/juicefs/write_job.yaml.#5365
Conversation
…fs/write_job.yaml. Signed-off-by: JiGuoDing <485204300@qq.com>
Summary of ChangesHello @JiGuoDing, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request implements a crucial security enhancement by introducing a memory limit to a Kubernetes Job definition within the end-to-end test suite. The change ensures that the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses the security finding by adding a memory limit to the write_job.yaml. This is a good improvement. I've added one suggestion to further enhance resource management for this job by also including CPU limits and resource requests, which is a Kubernetes best practice. You might consider applying a similar change to read_job.yaml for consistency across the test jobs.
| resources: | ||
| limits: | ||
| ephemeral-storage: "5Gi" | ||
| memory: "512Mi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While adding a memory limit is a great step for security and resource management, it's also a best practice to define CPU limits, as well as both CPU and memory requests. This ensures more predictable performance and better scheduling by Kubernetes. For a simple job like this, the requests can be small.
resources:
limits:
ephemeral-storage: "5Gi"
memory: "512Mi"
cpu: "500m"
requests:
memory: "64Mi"
cpu: "100m"
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5365 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 57.66% 57.66%
=======================================
Files 446 446
Lines 30931 30931
=======================================
Hits 17835 17835
Misses 11477 11477
Partials 1619 1619 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: RongGu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |



Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does
This PR addresses the security finding “Memory limits should be enforced in test/gha-e2e/juicefs/write_job.yaml”.
The code below demonstrates how to securely configure a Kubernetes Job with constrained resource usage by explicitly setting:
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
fixes #5364
Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Run the test setup to see if there still remain code scanning alerts.
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews