Implement logical constraints in feed decorator form #83
Conversation
This commit introduces a new method `_isDecoratorApplicableToRole` to centralize the logic for determining if a decorator type is applicable to a user role. This change improves code maintainability and prevents illogical configurations in the dashboard. - Added `_isDecoratorApplicableToRole` method in `_FeedDecoratorFormState` class - Updated checkbox visibility logic in `buildRoleConfigCheckbox` method
Summary of ChangesHello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a good refactoring by centralizing the business logic for feed decorator applicability into a new _isDecoratorApplicableToRole method. This improves code clarity and maintainability by preventing illogical configurations in the UI. The changes in draft_headlines_bloc.dart and draft_topics_bloc.dart are minor formatting fixes.
I've added one suggestion to improve the user experience in the form. Currently, if an illogical configuration already exists, it's shown as a checked and disabled checkbox, which can be confusing. My suggestion ensures it's displayed as unchecked and disabled, making the state clearer to the user.
…tors - Update checkbox value to consider both roleConfig and isApplicable - Ensures the checkbox is only enabled for applicable roles
fulleni
deleted the
Implement-Logical-Constraints-in-FeedDecoratorForm
branch
Status
This pull request enhances the FeedDecoratorForm by implementing logical constraints that govern the applicability of various feed decorators to different user roles. This ensures that only valid decorator-role combinations can be selected, preventing illogical configurations in the dashboard. Additionally, it includes minor code cleanup by removing unnecessary whitespace in two BLoC files.
Description
Type of Change