-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
[webview_flutter] Apply upstream (webview_flutter-v2.1.1) #236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@HakkyuKim @swift-kim @bbrto21 |
|
It seems that |
|
I can resolve most errors/warnings in #234 except for "Document all public members" for |
|
@HakkyuKim 👌 I'll do that stuff! |
3901290 to
63c1e53
Compare
@bwikbs Could you make it as a separate PR? This PR is supposed to only change webview_flutter-related things. |
Sure~. It's was just for testing purposes. Don't worry 😄 |
|
@HakkyuKim 🙆♂️ |
|
@HakkyuKim I have simple question! #234 -> apply '2.5.1' -> #236 OR #234 -> #236 -> apply '2.5.1' ? |
|
@HakkyuKim |
|
Beware that updating the |
|
@swift-kim @bwikbs |
Signed-off-by: MuHong Byun <mh.byun@samsung.com>
|
After a short discussion, we decided to include #240 to this PR. |
HakkyuKim
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you also update to
dependencies:
webview_flutter_tizen: ^0.3.7in packages/webview_flutter/README.md?
Signed-off-by: MuHong Byun <mh.byun@samsung.com>
!!! Good point! 👍 |
HakkyuKim
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
| flutter: | ||
| sdk: flutter | ||
| webview_flutter: ^2.0.4 | ||
| webview_flutter: ^2.1.1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't care but please be aware of the implicit indirect dependency (webview_flutter → webview_flutter_platform_interface).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry 😢 I can't get your point. What do you concern about?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why don't you explicitly add a dependency about webview_flutter_platform_interface?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
webview_flutter_platform_interface is dependent webview_flutter. Do I have to use it unconditionally to use a higher version of webview_flutter?
What's the point of being explicit? (I'm really curious to ask... )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The webview_flutter_tizen package is an implementation of webview_flutter_platform_interface, so it's very natural to specify which version of webview_flutter_platform_interface the package implements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right! I'll fix it!
Signed-off-by: MuHong Byun <mh.byun@samsung.com>
|
@swift-kim I've already did that. Thanks for letting me know anyway. 😄 |
…zen#236) * [webview_flutter] Apply upstream (webview_flutter-v2.1.1) Signed-off-by: MuHong Byun <mh.byun@samsung.com> * Add reviewer's comment Signed-off-by: MuHong Byun <mh.byun@samsung.com> * Add reviewer's comment Signed-off-by: MuHong Byun <mh.byun@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: MuHong Byun mh.byun@samsung.com