- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 29.4k
Add DropdownMenu.decorationBuilder #176264
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
        
      
            auto-submit
  merged 3 commits into
  flutter:master
from
bleroux:add_DropdownMenu_decorationBuilder
  
      
      
   
  Oct 20, 2025 
      
    
      
        
          +296
        
        
          −43
        
        
          
        
      
    
  
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            3 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      
    File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you think if there will be a case where the user doesn't want the
sufficIconat all? I'm thinking whether we should still give it a default value when suffixIcon is null.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting.
The property
DropdownMenu.showTrailingIconwas added some time ago in #167782 for that purpose.Because
DropdownMenu.decorationBuilderis new we can decide to use a different solution. Nonetheless, If we don't add a default suffix whensuffixIconis null, most of the users will have to provide their implementation or we have to offer them an API to get the default Icon. It seems to add complexity for a use case which is somewhat specific.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd propose to always add the default icon, also with a custom decoration (when the user adds an additinal trailing icon, then keep it in a
Row). And the user can still disable it via the propertyshowTrailingIcon. That way the dev does not need to implement it, e.g. also with providing more additional trailing actions, but still has the opportunity to remove it.That way it has a purpose in all cases, while providing maximum flexibility and minimal effort for the dev.
The other way around: in the current implementation, if the user defines its own trailing icon, the
showTrailingIcondoes not have any effect, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding a Row fits specific use cases and for these use cases it might be better for us to expose the default button construction if you think this would be interesting and let users add a Row (or something else) if needed (that way they can control padding for instance or anything matching their design).
My reasonning is to remove as much as possible custom rendering logic outside of
DropdownMenu. In that particular case,InputDecoratoralready implements APIs that comply with M3 spec (padding, defaults colors, borders, etc) and offer flexibility (InputDecoration.suffix, InputDecoration.suffixIcon, etc).Yes. It surely should be documented (in fact the best move would probably to rename
showTrailingIcontoshowDefaultTrailingIconin that case). We can also decide to ignoreInputDecoration.suffixIconifshowTrailingIconis false, it might be easier to document/understand.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point.
Of course the
Rowwas just meant as an internal helper to still be able to access the default trailing icon. But yes, it would then only serve in that (in my opinion most common) use case, and shrinks flexibility how (e.g. in which order) to use it.I personally don't need the default trailing button, as the fuctionality can easily be recreated with the controller. Not sure if folks would notice / search for the constructor of the default icon.
Sounds reasonable. Happy with both variants :)
Btw thank you for your efforts!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, it makes sense to me.