Update title for Flutter setup documentation

[mit-mit]

Hopefully/expectedly the quickstart covers everyones general needs, so this page is for more specific needs

Description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why: n/a

Issues fixed by this PR (if any): n/a

PRs or commits this PR depends on (if any): n/a

Presubmit checklist

• If you are unwilling, or unable, to sign the CLA, even for a tiny, one-word PR, please file an issue instead of a PR.
• If this PR is not meant to land until a future stable release, mark it as draft with an explanation.
• This PR follows the Google Developer Documentation Style Guidelines—for example, it doesn't use i.e. or e.g., and it avoids I and we (first-person pronouns).
• This PR uses semantic line breaks
  of 80 characters or fewer.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the title of the Flutter custom setup documentation page to better reflect its purpose of addressing specific user needs beyond the general quickstart guide.

Highlights

• Title Update: The title of the 'Custom setup' page was updated from 'Set up Flutter for your needs' to 'Set up Flutter for your specific needs'.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• src/content/install/custom.md
  • Updated the title to emphasize specific user needs.

Activity

• The PR modifies the title of the custom setup documentation page.
• The change aims to clarify the page's focus on specific user requirements.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

The pull request updates the title of the 'Custom setup' documentation page for Flutter. The change replaces 'Set up Flutter for your needs' with 'Set up Flutter for your specific needs'.

[flutter-website-bot]

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit 2a7be2f):

https://flutter-docs-prod--pr13120-mit-mit-patch-1-a3jb6xgf.web.app

[sfshaza2]

It's nuance, but I actually like "particular" better than "specific". Thoughts, @mit-mit?

[sfshaza2]

I'll go ahead and approve, but I do like "particular".

[mit-mit]

I'm indifferent between those two, so feel free to change!