ReproMin v0.1.0.dev9: installable pilot for failure-preserving reduction #16
Replies: 6 comments
|
Maintainer update (2026-09-01): ReproMin v0.1.0.dev7 is available as a GitHub pre-release: https://github.com/fly1d/repomin/releases/tag/v0.1.0.dev7 The release adds privacy-safe adoption evidence through Assets passed |
|
Follow-up (2026-09-01): tag CI for v0.1.0.dev7 has completed successfully across the Python/JDK matrix, Windows/macOS/Linux, Action smoke, offline benchmarks, and isolated wheel/source-distribution checks: https://github.com/fly1d/repomin/actions/runs/33466996058 |
|
Maintainer update (2026-09-01): ReproMin |
|
Maintainer update (2026-09-01): ReproMin This release adds If you have a sanitized CI or dependency-failure workflow, please install the wheel or source archive from the release page and share a short pilot report in Issue #11. A small fixture, an inconclusive run, or an onboarding problem is useful too. Please omit credentials, private URLs, proprietary source, raw logs, and environment values; the host backend is not a sandbox. |
|
Follow-up (2026-09-01): the No source changes were needed; the initial failure was a timing-sensitive Windows test startup. The release remains a pre-alpha, descriptive-only pilot build. |
|
For contributors looking for a small first task, Issue #19 is now open: add the existing FastAPI/Docker fixture to the runnable examples guide. It is documentation-only, has explicit acceptance criteria, and helps Python users try the dev9 pilot without changing reducer behavior. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ReproMin
v0.1.0.dev9is available as a GitHub pre-release: https://github.com/fly1d/repomin/releases/tag/v0.1.0.dev9ReproMin reduces a failing repository while repeatedly checking the configured failure contract, then exports a smaller payload with an auditable report. This release includes:
repomin doctorfor a read-only toolchain and baseline preflightrepomin report validateand fresh-copyrepomin report replayrepomin report comparefor read-only, descriptive comparison of two or more validated reportsTry a pilot
Install the wheel in an isolated environment, then follow the real-failure pilot guide. The shortest useful path is
doctor-> one reduction ->report validate; runreport replayonly after reviewing the unsigned report and command. When a workflow is repeated,report comparecan show aggregate evidence and context drift without reading payloads, executing commands, or accessing the network.We are looking for sanitized CI or dependency-failure workflows, small public fixtures, and reports of successful, inconclusive, or blocked trials. Please use Issue #11 for a real failure or the user workflow feedback template for value and friction. Share only the language/build system, runner, options, aggregate sizes, limitations, and sanitized evidence. Do not post credentials, private URLs, proprietary source, raw logs, commands, or environment values.
The project is pre-alpha. A passing oracle is evidence for one configured failure in one recorded environment, not a correctness, causal, production-reliability, or security guarantee. The host backend executes commands directly; Docker is defense in depth rather than a complete sandbox.
All reactions