Skip to content

Update README.md#168

Merged
flyingrobots merged 2 commits intomainfrom
flyingrobots-patch-1
Sep 14, 2025
Merged

Update README.md#168
flyingrobots merged 2 commits intomainfrom
flyingrobots-patch-1

Conversation

@flyingrobots
Copy link
Owner

@flyingrobots flyingrobots commented Sep 14, 2025

Description

Brief description of what this PR does.

Related Issue

Fixes #(issue number)

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update

Testing

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have added/updated documentation as needed

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have run make test in Docker
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Revamped README into a narrative, marketing-friendly structure with new sections (e.g., The Magic, Real-World Uses, Team Knowledge, EPILOGUE).
    • Added a prominent early-stage risk disclaimer banner and external tutorial/walkthrough links.
    • Replaced local hero with a centered high-res remote logo and added build/license/status badges.
    • Introduced practical examples and CLI walkthroughs, simplified technical detail, and updated licensing/author attribution.

Signed-off-by: James Ross <james@flyingrobots.dev>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 14, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md was rewritten to shift from technical details to a user-focused, marketing-style document with new sections, badges, imagery updates, usage examples, and external links; prior technical sections were removed or replaced. No code or API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Documentation overhaul
README.md
Replaced technical overview with narrative-driven sections, onboarding examples, and external tutorial links; added prominent risk disclaimer banner and build/license/status badges; swapped local hero image for a remote higher-resolution logo and centered it; restructured content into marketing/story sections (e.g., THE PROMISE, EPILOGUE, REAL-WORLD USES), moved/rewrote Quick Start and usage examples, and updated licensing/author lines.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The PR description is the repository's template left with placeholder text and unchecked boxes, so it lacks a concise summary of what was changed, a concrete Related Issue reference, the selected Type of Change, testing details, and completed checklist items, leaving reviewers without the context needed to evaluate the PR. Complete the Description by providing a short summary of the README changes and rationale, add or remove the Related Issue reference, mark the appropriate Type of Change (likely "Documentation update"), describe any testing performed or state none, and update the Checklist (e.g., confirm tests run and docs updated); optionally list the major sections added/removed to help reviewers focus their review.
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The PR title "Update README.md" correctly indicates the file changed but is overly generic and does not convey the large scope or intent of the rewrite (a marketing/vision-driven overhaul that removes many technical sections and adds Quick Start and AI-focused content), so it does not give reviewers a clear, immediate understanding of the main change. Please replace the title with a concise, descriptive summary of the primary change (for example, "Overhaul README: marketing‑driven rewrite with Quick Start and AI co‑thought") so reviewers can immediately see the scope and intent; keep it short and focused on the main change.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4e101a and 1542309.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Signed-off-by: James Ross <james@flyingrobots.dev>
@flyingrobots flyingrobots merged commit e5d1b4b into main Sep 14, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
@flyingrobots flyingrobots deleted the flyingrobots-patch-1 branch September 14, 2025 22:01
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 10

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 218b3f0 and d4e101a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md

21-21: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


21-21: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


23-23: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 3

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


23-23: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)


25-25: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 3

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


25-25: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)


27-27: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 3

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


27-27: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)


28-28: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


28-28: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


119-119: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


125-125: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


131-131: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


213-213: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


213-213: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


217-217: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


217-217: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


217-217: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


227-227: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


227-227: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


235-235: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


235-235: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


235-235: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

11-16: Tagline copy LGTM.


7-9: Badges: CI and LICENSE present; docs/roadmap.md missing — add or update Status badge

README.md (lines 7–9): .github/workflows/ci.yml and LICENSE exist; docs/roadmap.md is missing. Add docs/roadmap.md or update/remove the Status badge link.


<p align="center">
<img src="assets/logo.jpg" alt="git-mind logo" width="200" />
<img src="https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/neuroglyph/git-mind/main/assets/images/logo.png" alt="git-mind logo" width="400" />
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Prefer local asset over remote GitHub media URL for resiliency/offline rendering.

Use a repo‑relative path so the logo renders without network access and avoids third‑party fetches.

-<img src="https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/neuroglyph/git-mind/main/assets/images/logo.png" alt="git-mind logo" width="400" />
+<img src="assets/images/logo.png" alt="git-mind logo" width="400" />
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
<img src="https://media.githubusercontent.com/media/neuroglyph/git-mind/main/assets/images/logo.png" alt="git-mind logo" width="400" />
<img src="assets/images/logo.png" alt="git-mind logo" width="400" />
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around line 4 the logo image uses a remote GitHub media URL which
can fail offline; replace the src with a repository-relative path to the local
asset (e.g. assets/images/logo.png) and ensure the file exists in the repo,
updating the alt/width attributes as needed so the README uses the local asset
instead of the external URL.

README.md Outdated
Comment on lines 19 to 29
> [!WARNING]
> **This project is in its early stages — _USE AT YOUR OWN RISK_.**
> Right now you can’t do much with it yet, and it *does* make changes inside your Git repo.
> Proceed only if you’re curious and comfortable experimenting.
>
> This README is more of a **Vision Statement™** than a manual. It’s here to set the direction, hype the idea, and motivate ongoing work.
>
> If you’re intrigued, **star the repo** ⭐, follow along in **Discussions/Releases**, and watch it grow.
>
> — *flyingrobots*

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Fix markdownlint issues in warning callout (MD009/MD027/MD049).

Remove trailing spaces/extra spaces after >, and switch emphasis to underscores as the linter expects.

-> [!WARNING]  
-> **This project is in its early stages — _USE AT YOUR OWN RISK_.**  
-> Right now you can’t do much with it yet, and it *does* make changes inside your Git repo.  
-> Proceed only if you’re curious and comfortable experimenting.  
->
-> This README is more of a **Vision Statement™** than a manual. It’s here to set the direction, hype the idea, and motivate ongoing work.  
->
-> If you’re intrigued, **star the repo** ⭐, follow along in **Discussions/Releases**, and watch it grow.  
->
-> — *flyingrobots*  
+> [!WARNING]
+> **This project is in its early stages — _USE AT YOUR OWN RISK_.**
+> Right now you can’t do much with it yet, and it _does_ make changes inside your Git repo.
+> Proceed only if you’re curious and comfortable experimenting.
+>
+> This README is more of a **Vision Statement™** than a manual. It’s here to set the direction, hype the idea, and motivate ongoing work.
+>
+> If you’re intrigued, **star the repo** ⭐, follow along in **Discussions/Releases**, and watch it grow.
+>
+> — _flyingrobots_
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
> [!WARNING]
> **This project is in its early stages — _USE AT YOUR OWN RISK_.**
> Right now you can’t do much with it yet, and it *does* make changes inside your Git repo.
> Proceed only if you’re curious and comfortable experimenting.
>
> This README is more of a **Vision Statement™** than a manual. It’s here to set the direction, hype the idea, and motivate ongoing work.
>
> If you’re intrigued, **star the repo** ⭐, follow along in **Discussions/Releases**, and watch it grow.
>
> *flyingrobots*
> [!WARNING]
> **This project is in its early stages — _USE AT YOUR OWN RISK_.**
> Right now you can’t do much with it yet, and it _does_ make changes inside your Git repo.
> Proceed only if you’re curious and comfortable experimenting.
>
> This README is more of a **Vision Statement™** than a manual. It’s here to set the direction, hype the idea, and motivate ongoing work.
>
> If you’re intrigued, **star the repo** ⭐, follow along in **Discussions/Releases**, and watch it grow.
>
> _flyingrobots_
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

21-21: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


21-21: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


23-23: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 3

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


23-23: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)


25-25: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 3

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


25-25: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)


27-27: Trailing spaces
Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 3

(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)


27-27: Multiple spaces after blockquote symbol

(MD027, no-multiple-space-blockquote)


28-28: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


28-28: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 19 to 29, the warning callout contains trailing spaces
and extra spaces after the blockquote marker and uses asterisks for emphasis
which triggers markdownlint rules MD009/MD027/MD049; remove any trailing spaces
at the ends of lines, ensure each blockquote line uses a single space after the
'>' (no multiple spaces), and replace asterisk-based emphasis (e.g. *text*) with
underscore-based emphasis (_text_) so the callout conforms to the linter.

Comment on lines +83 to +102
## 🚀 Quick Start

- Architecture: link docs ⇄ code ⇄ tests; explore fan‑in/out and evolution.
- Notes/Zettelkasten: link ideas, excerpts, and references across a repo.
- Research: connect papers, datasets, scripts, and results with provenance.
- Product: trace features through specs, issues, code, tests, and docs.
- Decisions: tie ADRs to impacted modules and follow their downstream effects.
```bash
# Install
brew install git-mind # macOS/Linux
winget install git-mind # Windows

## How It Works
# Start linking
git mind link README.md src/main.c --type documents
git mind link src/auth.c tests/auth.test.js --type "tested-by"

- Journal (truth)
- Each edge append becomes a Git commit under `refs/gitmind/edges/<branch>` with a compact CBOR payload.
- Append‑only, branch‑scoped, time‑travel‑safe; merges behave like code.
- Cache (speed)
- Optional Roaring Bitmap indices under `refs/gitmind/cache/<branch>` for O(log N) set ops.
- Rebuildable; never merged; safe to delete.
# Explore connections
git mind list --from src/auth.c
git mind query "what depends on auth.c"

## Core Concepts
# What breaks if I change this?
git mind impact src/api/user.h
7 files directly affected
12 files transitively affected
```
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Install commands likely require published packages; verify availability before merging.

Confirm Homebrew and Winget packages exist; if not, gate behind “coming soon” or link to manual install.


🌐 Web query:

Is there a Homebrew formula or tap for "git-mind" and a Winget package for "git-mind" published by "neuroglyph"?

💡 Result:

Short answer: No — I couldn't find a Homebrew formula/tap or a Windows (winget) package for "git-mind" published by a publisher named "neuroglyph."

What I checked (examples):

  • Homebrew formula index (no "git-mind" formula/tap found among formulae). [1]
  • Public package listings / searches — found an npm package named "git-mind" (not tied to a Homebrew or winget publisher) and no evidence that a user/organization named "neuroglyph" publishes a git-mind package. [2][3]

If you want, I can:

  • Search more widely (GitHub repos, individual Homebrew taps on GitHub, and the winget community repository) and return any exact matches I find (with direct links).

Sources:

  1. Homebrew Formulae search/index. [1]
  2. "git-mind" npm/package listing. [2]
  3. "Neuroglyph" (example author/profile — no evidence of packaging activity). [3]

Gate/remove package-manager install commands in README (Homebrew/Winget)

No Homebrew formula/tap or Winget package for "git-mind" (publisher "neuroglyph") was found. File: README.md lines 83-102. Replace those install commands with either manual install steps, an explicit "coming soon" note, or links to the published Homebrew/Winget packages once they exist.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 83 to 102, the Quick Start shows Homebrew and Winget
install commands that are not published and should be removed or gated; update
the section to remove or replace those package-manager install lines with either
manual installation steps, a "coming soon" note, or explicit links to the
Homebrew/Winget packages once published, and ensure the rest of the quick-start
commands remain accurate and reference the chosen install method.

- Attribution: Who/what created the edge (human/AI), with author/session metadata. Surfaces as filters and review signals.
- AUGMENTS: Evolution links (old blob → new blob) created on edits to preserve meaning through change.
- Advice (optional): Data‑driven semantics (e.g., symmetry, implies) that merge deterministically.
👉 For a hands-on walkthrough, see [the tutorial](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/tutorial.md).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid external tutorial host; prefer repo‑local docs link.

Update to a relative path to keep links stable.

-👉 For a hands-on walkthrough, see [the tutorial](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/tutorial.md).
+👉 For a hands-on walkthrough, see [the tutorial](docs/tutorial.md).
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
👉 For a hands-on walkthrough, see [the tutorial](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/tutorial.md).
👉 For a hands-on walkthrough, see [the tutorial](docs/tutorial.md).
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around line 104, the tutorial link points to an external host;
change it to a repo-local relative path (for example ./docs/tutorial.md or
docs/tutorial.md) so the link remains stable; update the Markdown link target to
the relative path and verify the referenced file exists in the repository and
adjust the path if the tutorial lives in a different directory.

Comment on lines +119 to +131
**Software Architecture**

# List links (human)
git mind list --from src/auth.c
- Trace decisions through code
- See which tests cover which requirements
- Understand impact before refactoring

# Example (stub) output
> docs/auth-flow.md (type: implements, lane: verified)
**Research & Writing**

# List links (JSON)
git mind list --from src/auth.c --format json
- Build Zettelkasten-style note networks
- Track citation graphs
- Fork and extend others' research

# Rebuild performance cache for current branch
git mind cache-rebuild
**Team Knowledge**
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Use headings instead of bold text for section titles (MD036).

Promote these to ### to satisfy the linter and improve structure.

-**Software Architecture**
+### Software Architecture
@@
-**Research & Writing**
+### Research & Writing
@@
-**Team Knowledge**
+### Team Knowledge
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
**Software Architecture**
# List links (human)
git mind list --from src/auth.c
- Trace decisions through code
- See which tests cover which requirements
- Understand impact before refactoring
# Example (stub) output
> docs/auth-flow.md (type: implements, lane: verified)
**Research & Writing**
# List links (JSON)
git mind list --from src/auth.c --format json
- Build Zettelkasten-style note networks
- Track citation graphs
- Fork and extend others' research
# Rebuild performance cache for current branch
git mind cache-rebuild
**Team Knowledge**
### Software Architecture
- Trace decisions through code
- See which tests cover which requirements
- Understand impact before refactoring
### Research & Writing
- Build Zettelkasten-style note networks
- Track citation graphs
- Fork and extend others' research
### Team Knowledge
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

119-119: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


125-125: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)


131-131: Emphasis used instead of a heading

(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 119 to 131, the section titles are formatted with bold
text instead of markdown headings which triggers MD036; replace each bolded
section title (e.g., "**Software Architecture**", "**Research & Writing**",
"**Team Knowledge**") with a level-3 heading (### Software Architecture, ###
Research & Writing, ### Team Knowledge) and leave the list items beneath them
unchanged so the linter passes and document structure is improved.

Comment on lines +167 to 174
## 📖 Documentation

git‑mind is designed to be a shared, versioned memory for humans and AI — a place where both parties can write edges, discover connections, and converge by merging branches.
- **[Install git-mind](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/install.md)** — 30 seconds
- **[Try the tutorial](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/tutorial.md)** — 5 minutes
- **[Read the philosophy](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/philosophy.md)** — Why we built this
- **[Technical details](https://claude.ai/chat/TECHNICAL.md)** — How it works under the hood
- **[Contributing](https://claude.ai/chat/CONTRIBUTING.md)** — PRs welcome!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Docs links should be repo‑relative, not external placeholders.

Point to files under docs/ (or root) for durability.

-- **[Install git-mind](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/install.md)** — 30 seconds
-- **[Try the tutorial](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/tutorial.md)** — 5 minutes
-- **[Read the philosophy](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/philosophy.md)** — Why we built this
-- **[Technical details](https://claude.ai/chat/TECHNICAL.md)** — How it works under the hood
-- **[Contributing](https://claude.ai/chat/CONTRIBUTING.md)** — PRs welcome!
+- **[Install git-mind](docs/install.md)** — 30 seconds
+- **[Try the tutorial](docs/tutorial.md)** — 5 minutes
+- **[Read the philosophy](docs/philosophy.md)** — Why we built this
+- **[Technical details](docs/TECHNICAL.md)** — How it works under the hood
+- **[Contributing](CONTRIBUTING.md)** — PRs welcome!
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
## 📖 Documentation
git‑mind is designed to be a shared, versioned memory for humans and AI — a place where both parties can write edges, discover connections, and converge by merging branches.
- **[Install git-mind](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/install.md)** — 30 seconds
- **[Try the tutorial](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/tutorial.md)** — 5 minutes
- **[Read the philosophy](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/philosophy.md)** — Why we built this
- **[Technical details](https://claude.ai/chat/TECHNICAL.md)** — How it works under the hood
- **[Contributing](https://claude.ai/chat/CONTRIBUTING.md)** — PRs welcome!
## 📖 Documentation
- **[Install git-mind](docs/install.md)** — 30 seconds
- **[Try the tutorial](docs/tutorial.md)** — 5 minutes
- **[Read the philosophy](docs/philosophy.md)** — Why we built this
- **[Technical details](docs/TECHNICAL.md)** — How it works under the hood
- **[Contributing](CONTRIBUTING.md)** — PRs welcome!
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 167 to 174, the documentation links currently point to
external placeholder URLs; replace them with repo-relative paths that point to
the actual files in the repo (e.g., docs/install.md, docs/tutorial.md,
docs/philosophy.md, TECHNICAL.md, CONTRIBUTING.md or their correct locations),
updating each markdown link target accordingly so they are durable and work
locally and on GitHub.

Comment on lines +188 to 193
## 📊 Status

- Shipping now/next: journal (edges‑as‑commits), cache (fast queries), CLI (link/list/cache‑rebuild), names‑as‑truth semantics, AUGMENTS for evolution.
- Optional (behind flags, later): advice application (symmetry/implies), co‑thought workflows (AI “suggested” lanes, attribution filters), MCP service for tools to read/write edges locally.
🚀 **Early release** — Core features work today, API may evolve
📅 **[Roadmap](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/roadmap.md)** — See what's coming
🤝 **[Contributing](https://claude.ai/chat/CONTRIBUTING.md)** — Join the development

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Make Roadmap link consistent with the badge (repo‑relative).

-📅 **[Roadmap](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/roadmap.md)** — See what's coming  
+📅 **[Roadmap](docs/roadmap.md)** — See what's coming
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
## 📊 Status
- Shipping now/next: journal (edges‑as‑commits), cache (fast queries), CLI (link/list/cache‑rebuild), names‑as‑truth semantics, AUGMENTS for evolution.
- Optional (behind flags, later): advice application (symmetry/implies), co‑thought workflows (AI “suggested” lanes, attribution filters), MCP service for tools to read/write edges locally.
🚀 **Early release** — Core features work today, API may evolve
📅 **[Roadmap](https://claude.ai/chat/docs/roadmap.md)** — See what's coming
🤝 **[Contributing](https://claude.ai/chat/CONTRIBUTING.md)** — Join the development
## 📊 Status
🚀 **Early release** — Core features work today, API may evolve
📅 **[Roadmap](docs/roadmap.md)** — See what's coming
🤝 **[Contributing](https://claude.ai/chat/CONTRIBUTING.md)** — Join the development
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 188 to 193, the Roadmap link is an absolute URL but
should be repo-relative to match the badge style; update the link target from
"https://claude.ai/chat/docs/roadmap.md" to a repo-relative path like
"./docs/roadmap.md" (or "docs/roadmap.md") so it stays consistent when browsing
the repository or using relative rendering engines.

Created by J. Kirby Ross and the Neuroglyph Collective.

### Target Architecture
*"Hakuna Matata"* — no worries, your semantic connections are safe.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Emphasis style inconsistency flagged by markdownlint (MD049).

Either switch italics/bold to underscores across the file or relax MD049 in .markdownlint.json.

If keeping asterisks, add:

{
  "MD049": { "style": "asterisk" }
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

213-213: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)


213-213: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around line 213 the emphasis uses asterisks ("*Hakuna Matata*")
which triggers markdownlint rule MD049; to fix this either replace the asterisk
emphasis with underscores (e.g. _Hakuna Matata_) consistently across the file or
relax the lint rule by adding MD049 configuration into .markdownlint.json; if
you choose to keep asterisks, add a .markdownlint.json entry with "MD049": {
"style": "asterisk" } so the linter accepts the current style.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant