Skip to content

Improvements discussion #5

@eric-taix

Description

@eric-taix

First very good job, I'm using your Github action to audit each PR deployed on Netlify for a side project to verify that there's no performance, accessibillity regression and it works fine. 👏 👏 👏

I'm using the comment PR to be able to see the current value (even if all scores are higher than 90). For now I've only 5 urls to checks, but here's what could be improved in my point of view: this is a start of a discussion, to have your feedback and if you accept pull requests (didn't see any contribution page).

1- Urls are difficult to configure because this is a string with a comma separator. I think it could be easier if we can also configure urls with the following way:

  urls: |
    https://my-first-url
    https://my-second-url
    https://my-third-url

2- The comment added to the PR is a vertical table. Did you envisage to use a horizontal table ?

Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO PWA
92 87 100 100 0

Unfortunately not sure there's a way to remove the header row but it takes less height than a vertical table

3- Another way to render scores could be to use badge, which by the way can use colors

So let me know what are you thinking about these suggestions. And if you think that one/some of these suggestions could be implemented, do you accept PR?
What is the workflow ? You create an issue first...

Thanks again for your work

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions