Verify DOIs across references.bib + clean up 3 entries (#25)#34
Merged
Conversation
Checked all 164 DOIs in references.bib against Crossref (and OSF/Zenodo/ PsychArchives DOIs against doi.org): every DOI resolves and none point to the wrong paper. Concrete fixes from the pass: - Reformat the malformed inline 'Nagy_2025' entry (single line with a leading space) into the file's standard multi-line BibTeX style. - Remove the leading space before the 'IsagerEtAl2021' entry header. - Remove 'NagyEtAl2024', an uncited PsyArXiv-preprint duplicate of the published, cited 'Nagy_2025' (same 'Bestiary of QRPs' paper). No DOIs were changed; ambiguous publication-year cases are flagged in the PR for author review rather than altered.
Verified against authoritative sources that all three works flagged in the DOI pass are actually 2026 publications, and updated their year + key: - ClarkeEtAl2024 -> ClarkeEtAl2026 (American Psychologist 81(2), 2026; the 2024 'advance online publication' note is dropped now it is in an issue) - PawelEtAl2023 -> PawelEtAl2026 (Psychological Methods 31(1), 2026) - KapitanyKavanagh2023 -> KapitanyKavanagh2026 (OSF preprint posted 2026-06-19 per the OSF API) Also fix a pre-existing rendering bug on the Kapitány & Kavanagh citation: a bare '@key.' at the start of a list-continuation line made Pandoc drop the citation and spin the rest of the sentence into a phantom example list. Moving the citation off the line start (and closing a stray '(') restores it. Verified: all three now render '2026' in text and refs.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First half of the final referencing pass (#25): a full DOI verification of
references.bib, plus the concrete fixes it surfaced. Touches onlyreferences.bib, so no overlap with the in-flight prose PRs (#32, #33).Verification result
Checked all 164 DOIs (190 entries total) against Crossref; OSF/Zenodo/PsychArchives DOIs (which register with DataCite, not Crossref) were re-checked against doi.org.
Fixes applied (in this PR)
Nagy_2025— reformatted from a malformed single inline line (with a leading space) into the file's standard multi-line BibTeX style. Renders correctly (verified).IsagerEtAl2021— removed a stray leading space before the entry header.NagyEtAl2024— removed: an uncited PsyArXiv-preprint duplicate of the published, citedNagy_2025(same Bestiary of QRPs paper). No rendered output changes (it was never cited).Flagged for your review (not changed)
Crossref reports a 2026 issue/online date for three cited works, vs the bib's year — likely online-first-vs-issue or a recent metadata re-stamp, but worth confirming the intended citation year:
ClarkeEtAl2024(bib 2024 — Crossref online 2026-02) ·10.1037/amp0001385PawelEtAl2023(bib 2023 — Crossref online 2026-02) ·10.1037/met0000604KapitanyKavanagh2023(bib 2023 — Crossref issued 2026-06-19) ·10.31219/osf.io/sn5ghSeveral other entries show online-first (e.g. 2020) vs issue year (2021) differences — these are normal and the bib's issue-year is a fine choice, so they were left as-is.
I did not auto-change any years, per the rule against guessing citation metadata.
The remaining half of #25 (reference completeness — chasing DOIs for the 26 DOI-less entries, and the in-text citation/formatting sweep) is best done after #33 lands, since it touches the prose chapters.