Skip to content

Fix RecordReader not reading from stdin by default#94

Merged
yunzheng merged 2 commits intomainfrom
regression/recordreader-stdin
Oct 27, 2023
Merged

Fix RecordReader not reading from stdin by default#94
yunzheng merged 2 commits intomainfrom
regression/recordreader-stdin

Conversation

@yunzheng
Copy link
Member

Calling RecordReader without arguments should always default to stdin

@yunzheng yunzheng marked this pull request as draft October 26, 2023 19:25
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 26, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #94 (065c53d) into main (6144cf4) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #94      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.94%   78.97%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        2963     2963              
==========================================
+ Hits         2339     2340       +1     
+ Misses        624      623       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 78.97% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
flow/record/base.py 91.04% <100.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@yunzheng yunzheng changed the title Fix small regression in RecordReader behaviour Fix RecordReader not reading from stdin by default Oct 26, 2023
@yunzheng yunzheng marked this pull request as ready for review October 26, 2023 21:01
@yunzheng yunzheng requested a review from Schamper October 26, 2023 21:01
Calling RecordReader without arguments should always default to stdin
@yunzheng yunzheng force-pushed the regression/recordreader-stdin branch from 5d0cd07 to 065c53d Compare October 27, 2023 07:47
@yunzheng yunzheng merged commit 9cad89f into main Oct 27, 2023
@yunzheng yunzheng deleted the regression/recordreader-stdin branch October 27, 2023 08:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants