Structured pattern errors with position tracking#79
Merged
Conversation
…ailing slash for hostname-only pattern
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR replace sentinel errors with a new
PatternErrortype that provides structured, programmatic error handling for invalid route patterns. Each error includes the pattern, a categorized reason, a human-readable hint, and a byte range pointing at the offending segment.Callers can now use
errors.As/errors.AsType[T]to inspect pattern errors programmatically, andPatternError.Error()renders a visual diagnostic with a cursor:The new implementation is also a bit easier to maintain than the previous one.