-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
fix: wait for stretto cache insert before validation #2215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+9
−0
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@claude What thread will this block?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Claude finished @sanity's task —— View job
Analysis
The
cache.wait()call blocks the current tokio worker thread that's executing the async function.Call chain:
store_contract()is called fromverify_and_store_contract()(runtime.rs:1092)verify_and_store_contract()is anasync fnrunning on the tokio async runtimecache.wait()call is a synchronous blocking operation (not async)Impact:
Alternative approach:
If stretto provided an async
wait()method (likeasync fn wait()or returning a future), that would be preferable as it would allow the tokio worker thread to handle other tasks while waiting. But since stretto'sCacheis synchronous (notAsyncCache), and the wait time should be very short (just flushing the insert buffer), the current approach is acceptable.Note: The code uses
stretto::Cache(sync), notstretto::AsyncCache. The crate does have both variants available (Cargo.toml enables both "async" and "sync" features).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To clarify: while this technically blocks the tokio task, the important context is that this is not a cross-request race condition.
The
store_contract()→validate_state()sequence happens within a single PUT request, synchronously. Looking atverify_and_store_contract()in runtime.rs:The
validate_state()call immediately fetches the contract we just stored viaprepare_contract_call()→fetch_contract(). Withoutwait(), the buffered insert hasn't been processed yet, soget()returnsNoneand we get "contract not found".The window isn't "narrow" - it's essentially guaranteed to fail because it's two consecutive function calls in the same thread, and stretto buffers the insert for background processing.
[AI-assisted - Claude]