Update repository skills#199
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 10 minutes and 49 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Benchmark Results274 benchmarks Interpreted: 🟢 69 improved · 🔴 68 regressed · 137 unchanged · avg +0.1% arraybuffer.js — Interp: 🟢 5, 🔴 5, 4 unch. · avg -0.4% · Bytecode: 🔴 13, 1 unch. · avg -3.5%
arrays.js — Interp: 🔴 11, 8 unch. · avg -1.3% · Bytecode: 🟢 4, 🔴 12, 3 unch. · avg -2.0%
async-await.js — Interp: 🔴 2, 4 unch. · avg -0.4% · Bytecode: 🔴 6 · avg -5.7%
classes.js — Interp: 🟢 10, 🔴 4, 17 unch. · avg +0.5% · Bytecode: 🔴 27, 4 unch. · avg -8.1%
closures.js — Interp: 🟢 3, 🔴 1, 7 unch. · avg +0.2% · Bytecode: 🔴 6, 5 unch. · avg -3.4%
collections.js — Interp: 🟢 6, 6 unch. · avg +1.2% · Bytecode: 🟢 2, 🔴 7, 3 unch. · avg -3.5%
destructuring.js — Interp: 🟢 5, 🔴 2, 15 unch. · avg +0.1% · Bytecode: 🔴 20, 2 unch. · avg -5.7%
fibonacci.js — Interp: 🔴 4, 4 unch. · avg -1.2% · Bytecode: 🔴 7, 1 unch. · avg -3.8%
for-of.js — Interp: 🔴 4, 3 unch. · avg -1.5% · Bytecode: 🔴 5, 2 unch. · avg -3.5%
helpers/bench-module.js — Interp: 0 · Bytecode: 0
iterators.js — Interp: 🔴 8, 12 unch. · avg -1.6% · Bytecode: 🟢 1, 🔴 16, 3 unch. · avg -4.3%
json.js — Interp: 🟢 5, 🔴 6, 9 unch. · avg +0.4% · Bytecode: 🔴 16, 4 unch. · avg -3.8%
jsx.jsx — Interp: 🟢 1, 🔴 5, 15 unch. · avg -0.3% · Bytecode: 🔴 21 · avg -6.7%
modules.js — Interp: 🟢 3, 🔴 1, 5 unch. · avg +0.6% · Bytecode: 🟢 7, 🔴 2 · avg -0.0%
numbers.js — Interp: 🟢 4, 🔴 4, 3 unch. · avg +0.2% · Bytecode: 🟢 4, 🔴 6, 1 unch. · avg -0.3%
objects.js — Interp: 🟢 5, 2 unch. · avg +1.7% · Bytecode: 🔴 6, 1 unch. · avg -6.3%
promises.js — Interp: 🟢 11, 1 unch. · avg +3.5% · Bytecode: 🔴 12 · avg -8.1%
regexp.js — Interp: 🟢 4, 🔴 1, 6 unch. · avg +1.9% · Bytecode: 🔴 9, 2 unch. · avg -3.2%
strings.js — Interp: 🟢 2, 9 unch. · avg +0.4% · Bytecode: 🔴 8, 3 unch. · avg -4.2%
typed-arrays.js — Interp: 🟢 5, 🔴 10, 7 unch. · avg -1.1% · Bytecode: 🟢 2, 🔴 17, 3 unch. · avg -3.3%
Measured on ubuntu-latest x64. Benchmark ranges compare cached main-branch min/max ops/sec with the PR run; overlapping ranges are treated as unchanged noise. Percentage deltas are secondary context. |
Suite Timing
Measured on ubuntu-latest x64. |
Summary
Update project skills for AI coding agents