-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Models Classical
The analytical, physics-informed and statistical models that define the field-standard baseline for short-term probabilistic seismic forecasting. This page is an index: each model now lives on its own deep sub-page with its governing equation(s), parameter estimation, assumptions and failure modes, role in operational earthquake forecasting, a worked illustration, a diagram, and a References section with DOIs. A well-tuned ETAS remains the de-facto operational baseline that any candidate model — including every neural model — must beat in prospective Evaluation-and-Tests before it can claim forecasting skill.
Honest framing. Every model below produces, at best, a conditional rate or probability,
never a deterministic prediction. A prediction is a deterministic statement that an event will
or will not occur; a forecast gives a probability strictly in
Conventions used throughout. Magnitudes are homogenized to moment magnitude
The product is a conditional estimator: given recent observations
| Layer | Model(s) | Forecast role |
|---|---|---|
| Magnitude–frequency | Gutenberg-Richter-Law | Converts a rate of events |
| Aftershock decay | Omori-Utsu-Law, Reasenberg-Jones-Model | The dominant short-horizon (1–7 day) signal; the baseline for "tomorrow's earthquakes." |
| Self-exciting clustering | ETAS-Model | State-of-the-art physics-free short-term baseline; the model to beat. |
| Long-term smoothed rate | Smoothed-Seismicity | The time-independent spatial background |
| Medium-term precursory | EEPAS-Model | Months-to-years scale; outside the 1-week window, useful as a feature/context source. |
| Operational hybrid | STEP-Model | Production reference for the "next-day" probabilistic map output shape. |
| Renewal / recurrence | Brownian-Passage-Time | Long-term, fault-specific; conditions the background over years. |
| Physics-based stress | Rate-and-State-and-Coulomb | Mechanistic priors on where triggering is enhanced or suppressed. |
flowchart LR
GR[Gutenberg-Richter<br/>magnitude term] --> P[Published probability<br/>P = 1 - exp - N Phi]
OM[Omori-Utsu<br/>aftershock decay] --> ET[ETAS<br/>self-exciting clustering]
SM[Smoothed seismicity<br/>background mu] --> ET
ET --> P
RJ[Reasenberg-Jones] --> ST[STEP<br/>operational map]
OM --> RJ
RS[Rate-and-state + Coulomb<br/>stress priors] -. informs .-> ET
BPT[Brownian Passage Time<br/>renewal] -. conditions .-> SM
EEPAS[EEPAS<br/>medium-term] -. feature/context .-> ET
-
Gutenberg-Richter-Law — the frequency–magnitude relation
$\log_{10} N(\ge M) = a - b,M$ ; supplies the exponential magnitude density that distributes any forecast rate over magnitude, and sets the large-event tail via$b$ and$M_{\max}$ . -
Omori-Utsu-Law — the modified Omori law
$n(t) = K/(t+c)^p$ for aftershock-rate decay; the dominant short-horizon signal, with productivity,$c$ ,$p$ and post-mainshock incompleteness. - ETAS-Model — the Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence: a self-exciting (Hawkes) point process where every event triggers its own Omori aftershocks; the de-facto operational baseline to beat.
- Reasenberg-Jones-Model — the original operational aftershock model (Omori × Gutenberg–Richter) that produces calibrated next-day/next-week aftershock probabilities; basis of USGS OAF.
- STEP-Model — Short-Term Earthquake Probability: a daily hybrid that adds the time-varying clustering rate to a smoothed background, producing the canonical next-day probability map shape.
- EEPAS-Model — Every Earthquake a Precursor According to Scale: a medium-term model in which each event raises the rate of larger future events via predictive scaling relations.
-
Smoothed-Seismicity — the time-independent spatial background
$\mu(x,y)$ built by kernel smoothing of past epicentres; ETAS's background term and the project's mandatory Poisson null. - Brownian-Passage-Time — the BPT (inverse-Gaussian) renewal model for quasi-periodic recurrence of characteristic earthquakes on a single fault; long-term, time-dependent hazard.
-
Rate-and-State-and-Coulomb — Dieterich rate-and-state friction and Coulomb stress change
$\Delta\mathrm{CFS}$ ; the mechanistic layer giving physical priors on where triggering is favored.
Every model above feeds one object — a conditional intensity (rate)
This formula never changes; only the quality of
See also: Models-ML · Models-Employed · Temporal-Point-Processes · Methodology-History · Evaluation-and-Tests · References · Glossary
⚠️ Disclaimer — read this. CAOS_SEISMIC produces probabilistic forecasts, not predictions. It is an independent research and education tool. It is NOT an official earthquake early-warning or civil-protection system, it does NOT predict when, where, or how large an earthquake will be, and it must NOT be used for life-safety, emergency, or evacuation decisions. Every number it publishes is a bounded, calibrated probability conditioned on the present state of seismicity — never an alarm, a countdown, or a "safe" state. A single outcome neither confirms nor refutes a probabilistic forecast.It complements, and does not replace or speak for, official agencies — always follow your national seismological and civil-protection authorities (e.g. USGS, INGV, CSN (Chile, SENAPRED for civil protection), GeoNet, JMA). The software is provided "as is", without warranty of any kind (MIT License); the authors accept no liability for its use. Data are courtesy of their providers (USGS/ANSS, ISC/ISC-GEM, Global CMT, EMSC, CSN, and others) under their respective licenses and attribution terms. See Honest-Limits for the full epistemic context.
CAOS_SEISMIC · seismic.fasl-work.com · source · MIT
Conditional probabilistic seismic forecasting — forecasts, never predictions.
Overview
Methodology & History
Classical models
- Models-Classical · index
- Gutenberg-Richter-Law
- Omori-Utsu-Law
- ETAS-Model
- Reasenberg-Jones-Model
- STEP-Model
- EEPAS-Model
- Smoothed-Seismicity
- Brownian-Passage-Time
- Rate-and-State-and-Coulomb
ML & analytical methods
- Models-ML · index
- Temporal-Point-Processes
- RMTPP
- Neural-Hawkes-Process
- Transformer-Hawkes-Process
- RECAST-and-FERN
- CNN-Spatial-Models
- Graph-and-Recurrent-Networks
- Detection-vs-Forecasting
Models employed
Data
Architecture
Evaluation
Progress
Reference