Skip to content

TRI-NET cross-line package: P0 NMSE / P1 API+whitepaper / P2 22FDX projection + Zenodo bundles #696

@gHashTag

Description

@gHashTag

Cross-line TRI-NET package — P0/P1/P2 next-lineup improvements

This is the umbrella tracking issue for the next batch of TRI-NET line-level
deliverables in t27 (the spec-first toolchain + numeric format registry
product of the line). The work below is docs-and-specs only in t27
no gen/ edits, no new *.sh on the critical path, no silicon claims
beyond what already exists in STATUS.md.

The TRI-NET line is composed of t27 plus the three sibling chip repos
(tt-trinity-phi, tt-trinity-euler, tt-trinity-gamma); see
LINEUP.md for the four-product map. This issue tracks documents and
schemas that live in this repo and link out, where applicable, to those
chip repos.

Deliverables

P0 — GF16 vs bfloat16 NMSE standard comparison protocol

  • New doc: docs/GF16_BFLOAT16_NMSE_PROTOCOL.md
  • New machine-readable spec: specs/benchmarks/gf16_bfloat16_nmse.t27
  • New JSON schema for results manifest: schemas/nmse-protocol-v1.json
  • Spec must contain test / invariant / bench per L4 TESTABILITY.

P1 — TRI-NET API for external integration

  • New doc: docs/TRI_NET_API.md
  • New .t27 spec: specs/api/tri_net_api.t27
  • New JSON schema: schemas/tri-net-api-v1.json
  • Schema must be conservative — describe SHAPE of an external integration
    interface, not promise silicon behaviour.

P1 — TRI-NET whitepaper / value proposition

  • New doc: docs/TRI_NET_WHITEPAPER.md — open high-assurance ternary AI
    silicon substrate framing; cross-links to LINEUP.md,
    COMPETITORS.md, STATUS.md, BENCHMARKS.md, FORMAT_REGISTRY.md.

P2 — 22FDX TOPS/W projection methodology

  • New doc: docs/22FDX_TOPS_W_PROJECTION.md
  • Clearly labelled projection, not measured silicon, with assumptions
    and confidence levels. Cross-link to chip repos tt-trinity-euler and
    tt-trinity-gamma where 22FDX targeting is plausible-future, not
    promised.

P2 — Zenodo bundles plan for TRI-NET v1–v3

  • New doc: docs/ZENODO_BUNDLES.md
  • Manifest / checklist only — no fabricated DOIs. Existing
    DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877 (cited in NOW.md) is referenced as v0
    baseline; v1–v3 are planned bundles whose DOIs are issued only at
    upload time.

Cross-links

  • P0 D2D protocol spec lives in tt-trinity-euler / tt-trinity-gamma
    (chip repos). t27 surfaces only the toolchain-side hooks.
  • Triple-Deck chip implementation references the W47/W48/W49 Coq lemmas
    already landed in this repo (trios-coq/Physics/ — see docs/NOW.md),
    while the silicon-side Triple-Deck implementation lives in the chip
    repos.

Law compliance plan

  • L1 TRACEABILITY — this issue exists; PR must say Closes #N.
  • L2 GENERATION — no gen/ edits.
  • L3 PURITY — all new Markdown ASCII / English; Cyrillic check must
    pass (scripts/check_first_party_doc_language.py).
  • L4 TESTABILITY — new .t27 specs contain test / invariant /
    bench blocks.
  • L5 IDENTITYphi^2 + 1/phi^2 = 3 cited verbatim where relevant.
  • L6 CEILINGFORMAT-SPEC-001.json and gf16.t27 are referenced
    as SSOT; no new numeric kernel claims.
  • L7 UNITY — no new *.sh.

Out of scope

  • Silicon-measured TOPS/W numbers (these never appear unless backed by
    direct device evidence).
  • D2D protocol implementation (chip repos own this).
  • Fabricated or pre-allocated DOIs.

R5-HONEST posture

Every claim in the new docs is either backed by an in-repo artifact or
explicitly labelled as projection / planned. No silicon parity claim is
made against any commercial product.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions