Issue from Trinity Improvement Plan (Part 1, Priority 1)
Context
Current tests only use synthetic/standard datasets. Real-world validation needed.
Task Description
Benchmark HSLM on domain-specific datasets and compare against baselines.
Datasets to Test
- Code completion: GitHub codebase samples
- Medical notes: De-identified clinical text
- Scientific papers: ArXiv abstracts/full papers
Baselines to Compare
- FP32 baseline (full precision)
- Other ternary approaches
- Original HSLM paper benchmarks
Metrics to Collect
- Perplexity (PPL) on each dataset
- Accuracy (for tasks where applicable)
- Training speed (epochs/hour)
- Inference speed (tok/s)
- Model size (MB)
Deliverables
- Dataset + methodology publication
- Updated research documentation
- README with benchmark results
- Comparison paper (if significant findings)
Timeline
- Week 1: Dataset preparation
- Week 2-3: Training and evaluation
- Week 4: Analysis and write-up
Success Criteria
- HSLM achieves PPL within 10% of FP32 baseline
- Clear advantage demonstrated on at least one domain
- Results reproducible (code + data published)
Labels
priority: high, validation, research, hslm
type: experiment
component: hslm
Issue from Trinity Improvement Plan (Part 1, Priority 1)
Context
Current tests only use synthetic/standard datasets. Real-world validation needed.
Task Description
Benchmark HSLM on domain-specific datasets and compare against baselines.
Datasets to Test
Baselines to Compare
Metrics to Collect
Deliverables
Timeline
Success Criteria
Labels
priority: high, validation, research, hslm
type: experiment
component: hslm