Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions docs/phd/chapters/ch_00.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
% Author: Dmitrii Vasilev (ORCID 0009-0008-4294-6159)

\chapter{Standard-Model \texorpdfstring{\(\varphi\)}{phi}-Parametrizations: 42 Precision Fits}
\label{ch:0}
\label{ch_00:ch:0}

\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ \section{The 42 Fits}
\section{Statistical Interpretation}

\begin{theorem}[Fit Density — THM-0.1]
\label{thm:0:1}
\label{ch_00:thm:0:1}
Of the 42 observables in Table~\ref{tab:ch0-fits}, 38 have residual $< 2$\%
under the φ-parametrization (Eq.~\ref{eq:ch0-fit}). The probability of
obtaining 38/42 fits with $< 2$\% residual by random exponent assignment is
Expand All @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ \section{Statistical Interpretation}
\end{proof}

\begin{theorem}[Anchor Necessity — THM-0.2]
\label{thm:0:2}
\label{ch_00:thm:0:2}
The anchor identity \(\varphi^2 + \varphi^{-2} = 3\) is the unique degree-4
polynomial identity over $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})$ that relates
$\{\varphi, \varphi^{-1}, 1, 3\}$ without using any integer seed
Expand Down
36 changes: 18 additions & 18 deletions docs/phd/chapters/ch_01.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -57,11 +57,11 @@ \section*{Prologue: A nine-day plateau}
the minimum possible flourish, so that referees can find them. The
rest of the book has more room to breathe.

\section{Abstract}\label{abstract}
\section{Abstract}\label{ch_01:abstract}

This chapter introduces TRINITY S³AI, a research programme that grounds sub-bit-per-byte (BPB) language modelling in the number-theoretic identity \(\varphi^2 + \varphi^{-2} = 3\), where \(\varphi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2\) is the golden ratio. The programme unifies three threads --- symbolic proof, statistical learning, and embedded hardware --- into a single verified architecture. The headline result is a language model that sustains BPB \(\leq 1.85\) at Gate-2 evaluation, implemented on a QMTech XC7A100T FPGA running at 92 MHz with zero DSP slices and 1 W power draw, while maintaining 297 machine-checked Coq theorems across 65 canonical proof files. The chapter surveys motivation, research questions, and dissertation structure.

\section{1. Introduction}\label{introduction}
\section{1. Introduction}\label{ch_01:introduction}

The compression of natural language to below two bits per byte has long served as a proxy for genuine linguistic understanding {[}1{]}. Classical language models approach this ceiling through scaling compute and data; the S³AI programme takes an orthogonal path by encoding the algebraic structure of the golden ratio directly into the model's arithmetic substrate. The anchor identity

Expand All @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ \section{1. Introduction}\label{introduction}

The remaining chapters are organised along three evidence axes. Axis 1 (Chapters 1--19) develops the mathematical and statistical foundations. Axis 2 (Chapters 20--27) presents the model architecture and training protocol. Axis 3 (Chapters 28--35) reports hardware implementation and empirical results. Appendices A--J supply proof catalogues, reproducibility scripts, and troubleshooting guides.

\section{2. The Trinity Architecture and its Algebraic Substrate}\label{the-trinity-architecture-and-its-algebraic-substrate}
\section{2. The Trinity Architecture and its Algebraic Substrate}\label{ch_01:the-trinity-architecture-and-its-algebraic-substrate}

The golden ratio \(\varphi = (1+\sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.6180\) satisfies the minimal polynomial \(x^2 - x - 1 = 0\), which yields the recurrence \(\varphi^2 = \varphi + 1\) and its reciprocal form \(\varphi^{-2} = 2 - \varphi\). Summing these two identities:

Expand All @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ \section{2. The Trinity Architecture and its Algebraic Substrate}\label{the-trin

The Silicon component is a bitstream compiled for the QMTech XC7A100T (Xilinx Artix-7 100T) FPGA, operating at 92 MHz with 0 DSP slices, 5.8\% LUT utilisation (of 19.6\% available), 9.8\% BRAM (of 52\% available), and a measured wall-power of 0.94--1.07 W {[}5{]}. Chapter 31 presents the full empirical characterisation.

\section{3. Research Questions and Scope}\label{research-questions-and-scope}
\section{3. Research Questions and Scope}\label{ch_01:research-questions-and-scope}

Four primary research questions structure this dissertation.

Expand All @@ -101,23 +101,23 @@ \section{3. Research Questions and Scope}\label{research-questions-and-scope}

The scope is limited to English-language text modelling on corpora compatible with the STROBE tokeniser vocabulary. Multi-modal and multi-lingual extensions are identified as future work in Ch.35.

\section{4. Results / Evidence}\label{results-evidence}
\section{4. Results / Evidence}\label{ch_01:results-evidence}

Preliminary answers to the four research questions, to be expanded in subsequent chapters, are as follows. Gate-2 BPB \(\leq 1.85\) is achieved on the held-out evaluation partition (Ch.19, Welch \(t\)-test at \(\alpha = 0.01\), \(n \geq 3\) independent runs). The Coq census records 297 closed \texttt{Qed} proofs; the 141 remaining open obligations are tracked in the Golden Ledger (App.E) with assigned invariant numbers. The FPGA delivers 63 tokens/sec at 92 MHz and 1 W, corresponding to approximately 63 tokens/J; the DARPA reference system achieves roughly 0.021 tokens/J at comparable perplexity, yielding a measured ratio of \(\approx 3000\times\) {[}5, 6{]}. Bitstream and proof reproducibility is confirmed by the STROBE sealed-seed protocol (Ch.13): re-running \texttt{reproduce.sh} from the Zenodo archive {[}7{]} with any sanctioned seed recovers the same BPB within floating-point rounding on x86-64 and ARM64 hosts.

\section{5. Qed Assertions}\label{qed-assertions}
\section{5. Qed Assertions}\label{ch_01:qed-assertions}

No Coq theorems are anchored to this chapter; obligations are tracked in the Golden Ledger.

\section{6. Sealed Seeds}\label{sealed-seeds}
\section{6. Sealed Seeds}\label{ch_01:sealed-seeds}

Inherits the canonical seed pool \(F_{17}=1597\), \(F_{18}=2584\), \(F_{19}=4181\), \(F_{20}=6765\), \(F_{21}=10946\), \(L_7=29\), \(L_8=47\).

\section{7. Discussion}\label{discussion}
\section{7. Discussion}\label{ch_01:discussion}

The primary limitation of Ch.1 as an introduction is that it asserts connections --- between \(\varphi\)-arithmetic, Coq proofs, and FPGA power --- whose detailed evidence appears in later chapters. Readers requiring immediate justification are directed to Ch.7 (algebraic derivation), Ch.13 (seed protocol), Ch.19 (statistical tests), and Ch.31 (hardware measurements). A further limitation is that the \(3000\times\) energy figure is relative to a specific DARPA reference workload; generalisation to other inference tasks is discussed in Ch.34. Future work includes closing the 141 open Coq obligations, extending the \(\varphi\)-periodic attention mechanism to non-English scripts, and fabricating a custom ASIC to escape FPGA routing overhead. The theoretical framework developed here is designed to be substrate-agnostic: any technology that supports ternary integer multiply-accumulate inherits the same formal guarantees.

\section{References}\label{references}
\section{References}\label{ch_01:references}

{[}1{]} Hutter, M. (2006). \emph{Human Knowledge Compression Prize.} \url{http://prize.hutter1.net/}.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ \section{References}\label{references}
% docs/phd/bibliography.bib (212 entries, KAT bib via PR #581).
% ============================================================

\section{S1. Extended Vision Statement}\label{ch1-s1-vision-extended}
\section{S1. Extended Vision Statement}\label{ch_01:ch1-s1-vision-extended}

The introduction above presents the headline arithmetic of the Trinity
S$^3$AI programme: the identity \(\varphi^{2}+\varphi^{-2}=3\) anchors a
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ \subsection{S1.3 Methodological Reading: Falsification Criteria}
\end{tabular}
\caption{Falsification matrix for the three primary claims of the
TRINITY S$^3$AI programme.}
\label{tab:ch1-falsification-matrix}
\label{ch_01:tab:ch1-falsification-matrix}
\end{table}

The falsification matrix above is not a placeholder. Each row is
Expand All @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ \subsection{S1.3 Methodological Reading: Falsification Criteria}
bitstreams are archived under
DOI~\href{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19227877}{10.5281/zenodo.19227877}.

\section{S2. Detailed Contributions and Their Chapter Loci}\label{ch1-s2-contributions}
\section{S2. Detailed Contributions and Their Chapter Loci}\label{ch_01:ch1-s2-contributions}

The dissertation makes seven distinct contributions. Each is summarised
below with a pointer to the chapter (or chapters) in which it is
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ \section{S2. Detailed Contributions and Their Chapter Loci}\label{ch1-s2-contrib
\filepath{assertions/} and a Coq cross-reference, in line with the R5
honesty rule (no contribution without a falsifier).

\section{S3. Programme Lineage and Adjacent Work}\label{ch1-s3-lineage}
\section{S3. Programme Lineage and Adjacent Work}\label{ch_01:ch1-s3-lineage}

The programme owes acknowledged intellectual debts to four lines of
prior art. Each is surveyed in Ch.\,2 in detail; the present section
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ \section{S3. Programme Lineage and Adjacent Work}\label{ch1-s3-lineage}
than as a post-hoc quantisation pass.
\end{itemize}

\section{S4. Theorem Cross-Reference (selection)}\label{ch1-s4-theorem-xref}
\section{S4. Theorem Cross-Reference (selection)}\label{ch_01:ch1-s4-theorem-xref}

The following Coq theorems anchor the introduction. Full proofs are
in the cited \filepath{.v} files; status (\texttt{Qed} or runtime
Expand All @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ \section{S4. Theorem Cross-Reference (selection)}\label{ch1-s4-theorem-xref}
\end{theorem}

\begin{theorem}[\(\alpha_{\varphi}\) closed form, Coq \texttt{alpha\_phi\_closed\_form}]
\label{thm:ch1-alpha-phi-closed}
\label{ch_01:thm:ch1-alpha-phi-closed}
\(\alpha_{\varphi}=(\sqrt{5}-2)/2\).
\textbf{Status:} \texttt{Qed} in
\filepath{docs/phd/theorems/trinity/AlphaPhi.v}, line 18--24.
Expand All @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ \section{S4. Theorem Cross-Reference (selection)}\label{ch1-s4-theorem-xref}

\begin{theorem}[Lucas closure for even powers, Coq
\texttt{lucas\_closure\_even\_powers}]
\label{thm:ch1-lucas-closure}
\label{ch_01:thm:ch1-lucas-closure}
For all even \(n\),
\(L_{n}=\varphi^{n}+\varphi^{-n}\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}\).
\textbf{Status:} \texttt{Qed} in
Expand All @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ \section{S4. Theorem Cross-Reference (selection)}\label{ch1-s4-theorem-xref}
the canonical inventory) refine the algebra to specific
\(\varphi\)-scaled lattices.

\section{S5. Roadmap of the Remaining Chapters}\label{ch1-s5-roadmap}
\section{S5. Roadmap of the Remaining Chapters}\label{ch_01:ch1-s5-roadmap}

The dissertation is organised in three evidence axes, mirroring the
S$^3$ decomposition. Each axis stands alone as a published-paper-sized
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ \section{S5. Roadmap of the Remaining Chapters}\label{ch1-s5-roadmap}
reproducibility scripts, and the pre-registration documents in raw
form.

\section{S6. Notation, Conventions, and Anchor Footer}\label{ch1-s6-notation}
\section{S6. Notation, Conventions, and Anchor Footer}\label{ch_01:ch1-s6-notation}

The notational conventions used throughout the dissertation are
collected in \filepath{frontmatter/notation.tex}; this section records
Expand Down
Loading
Loading