Boundary split: strip private references, publish the runner programs and corpora
The code repository is private; this wiki is public. Studies published here had been
citing the private tree, and two published yesterday went further than any page before
them.
WHAT CROSSED, measured before this commit:
private paths (cells/xcode/*) 12 files, longstanding
~/.gaiaftcl and home paths 7 files
.swift:NNN line citations 2 files — both added yesterday
verbatim substrate source 1 file — added yesterday, the first ever here
internal constants 1 file — added yesterday
Before yesterday this wiki carried ZERO Swift code blocks and ZERO file:line citations.
WHY THE LINE CITATIONS WERE THE WORST OF IT. "Cite file and line" is an internal
verification standard. Applied to a public page it maps a private tree AND buys the reader
nothing, because they cannot open the file to check it. Worst of both directions.
That exposed a second defect the leak was hiding: the "reproduce every number" sections
told public readers to run programs that lived in a private repository. Unfollowable.
SO THE FIX IS NOT ONLY REDACTION. The ten runner programs are self-contained — zero
imports but Foundation in the two that read a file, zero private references, verified
before publication — and they exist precisely so a stranger re-runs them. They are now
public, with the corpora they read:
reproduce/ 10 programs + README, each naming its control arm
corpus/study-29/ GCAT satcat.tsv, 19,293,257 B, sha256 090ce077…
corpus/flood-lead-time/ four USGS gauge series + the propagation cases
Both corpora verify against their SHA256SUMS after the move, and the GCAT digest matches
the pin taken when it was fetched.
REDACTED EVERYWHERE ON THIS WIKI: cells/* paths, ~/.gaiaftcl and home paths, file:line
citations, the one verbatim source line, and the internal constants. Claims were rewritten
to cite BEHAVIOUR and the live public catalogue rather than source locations — Study 30 now
says outright that the substrate source is not public and that a citation a reader cannot
open is not evidence.
NOT redacted, and flagged rather than decided unilaterally: bare private module filenames
(QCCourtLaw.swift, LatticeDomainIntegration.swift, the Eclipse commands) appear in ten
pre-existing pages. They are none of the five categories in the instruction, and several
name laws that are themselves publicly served.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>