[Documentation]: Add missing bibliography entries

[edwardchalstrey1]

Requested documentation improvement

After the catalog additions in #811 I've updated the descriptions in these games in #767 to use Bibliography links, however this has highlighted some of these being missing:

• Rei2008
• Bag1995
• Wat13

Current bibliography: https://gambitproject.readthedocs.io/en/latest/biblio.html

[edwardchalstrey1]

Just realised I can get these from the files:

Reiley, David H., Urbancic, Michael B, and Walker, Mark. (2008)
Stripped-Down Poker: A Classroom Game with Signaling and Bluffing.
The Journal of Economic Education 4: 323-341.

Bagwell, Kyle (1995) Commitment and observability in games.
Games and Economic Behavior 8: 271-280

Watson, Joel. (2013) Strategy: An Introduction to Game Theory,
third edition. W. W. Norton & Company.

[rahulsavani]

I was just working on it actually, but yes, you've got the right references there.

The formatting in the bibliography and tutorials is slightly different though, so if you could update the new 3 in the bibliography to match the style of the existing ones that would be great.

[edwardchalstrey1]

Thanks @rahulsavani - not something my non-academic eyes would have easily noticed! But looks like the formatting is not totally consistent in the ones we already have? e.g.

[BlaTur23] Bland, J. R. and Turocy, T. L., 2023. Quantal response equilibrium as a structural model for estimation: The missing manual. SSRN working paper 4425515.

vs

[Eav71] B. C. Eaves, “The linear complementarity problem”, 612-634, Management Science , 17, 1971.

So bagwell could either be:

[Bag1995] Bagwell, Kyle, 1995. Commitment and observability in games. Games and Economic Behavior 8: 271-280.

or

[Bag1995] Kyle Bagwell, "Commitment and observability in games", 271-280, Games and Economic Behavior, 8, 1995.

[rahulsavani]

Thanks, Ed, good spot.

@tturocy: I am a bit obsessed with consistent bibliographic style, but don't mind so much what it is, within reason.

Do you have a preferred style? Then Ed and I can make sure we are using it consistently.

[tturocy]

We should be consistent, and I don't have a preference for what we use as long as we are consistent!