interesting properties from datacite, such as peerreviewed, embargoDate currently don't have a good match with iso19115/mcf
Peer-reviewed could be captured on iso19115 as:
- lifecyscle step identificationinfo/*/status = peer-review
- more formal: dataquality//report//evaluationmethodology = peer-review + result
- Processing step: dataquality/*/processstep/description
- as a keyword
Currently we only allow a single lifecycle status, so setting the status to complete, would undo the review status
dataquality reports and processing step require an extension of the mcf model, both would be useful to capture in a generic way
dataquality:
reports:
` - name:
type:
result: Embargo in theory could also be a lifecycle status, but typically this is captured as a date (embargo-till) so when the date passes, the record is automatically set as non-embargoed. It could make sense to add it as a identification/dates['embargo'] = 1-1-2028
@tomkralidis any thoughts?
interesting properties from datacite, such as
peerreviewed,embargoDatecurrently don't have a good match with iso19115/mcfPeer-reviewed could be captured on iso19115 as:
Currently we only allow a single lifecycle status, so setting the status to complete, would undo the review status
dataquality reports and processing step require an extension of the mcf model, both would be useful to capture in a generic way
Embargo in theory could also be a lifecycle status, but typically this is captured as a date (embargo-till) so when the date passes, the record is automatically set as non-embargoed. It could make sense to add it as a identification/dates['embargo'] = 1-1-2028
@tomkralidis any thoughts?