Skip to content

Conversation

@MdAsifHossainNadim
Copy link
Contributor

@MdAsifHossainNadim MdAsifHossainNadim commented Aug 2, 2024

All Submissions:

  • My code follow the WordPress' coding standards
  • My code satisfies feature requirements
  • My code is tested
  • My code passes the PHPCS tests
  • My code has proper inline documentation
  • I've included related pull request(s) (optional)
  • I've included developer documentation (optional)
  • I've added proper labels to this pull request

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

Related Pull Request(s)

Printful Integration

Closes

  • Closes #

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

  • Steps or issue link

Changelog entry

Fix: Add hooks and make compatible with printful integration

Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.

Before Changes

Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).

After Changes

Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).

Feature Video (optional)

Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.

PR Self Review Checklist:

  • Code is not following code style guidelines
  • Bad naming: make sure you would understand your code if you read it a few months from now.
  • KISS: Keep it simple, Sweetie (not stupid!).
  • DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself.
  • Code that is not readable: too many nested 'if's are a bad sign.
  • Performance issues
  • Complicated constructions that need refactoring or comments: code should almost always be self-explanatory.
  • Grammar errors.

FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:

As a reviewer, your feedback should be focused on the idea, not the person. Seek to understand, be respectful, and focus on constructive dialog.

As a contributor, your responsibility is to learn from suggestions and iterate your pull request should it be needed based on feedback. Seek to collaborate and produce the best possible contribution to the greater whole.

  • Correct — Does the change do what it’s supposed to? ie: code 100% fulfilling the requirements?
  • Secure — Would a nefarious party find some way to exploit this change? ie: everything is sanitized/escaped appropriately for any SQL or XSS injection possibilities?
  • Readable — Will your future self be able to understand this change months down the road?
  • Elegant — Does the change fit aesthetically within the overall style and architecture?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved visual presentation and alignment of delete action buttons for better user interaction.
    • Enhanced color-picker component with better validation and default handling for color inputs, simplifying user experience.
    • New action hooks added to the product editing interface for greater customization by developers.
    • Added navigation links in the settings for easier access to specific fields.
    • Expanded order metadata update functionality to include all request types, enhancing order synchronization.
    • New method for scrolling to specific setting fields, improving navigation within the settings page.
    • Enhanced customization of product types in the listing through new filtering capabilities.
    • Added margin spacing for icons in the dashboard menu for improved layout.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured robust handling of invalid color values in the color-picker component.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified the rendering of product types in the product listing to enhance readability and maintainability.
    • Improved formatting and readability of product title rendering within the product listing table.
  • Chores

    • Minor cosmetic changes to improve code structure without affecting functionality.

@MdAsifHossainNadim MdAsifHossainNadim added the Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval label Aug 2, 2024
@MdAsifHossainNadim MdAsifHossainNadim self-assigned this Aug 2, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 2, 2024

Walkthrough

This update modifies various components in the application to enhance functionality and maintainability. Key changes include adjustments to the styling of the delete action button, updates to the color picker for improved validation, and the introduction of new hooks for product editing. Additionally, code refactoring in product listings streamlines logic, while new event handling in settings enables dynamic navigation.

Changes

Files Change Summary
assets/src/less/products.less, assets/src/less/site-navigation.less Adjusted styling for .action-delete, removing the right property and changing display to flex for better alignment. Added margin to svg elements in navigation.
includes/Order/Manager.php Modified maybe_split_orders function to execute order metadata update actions unconditionally, regardless of request type.
src/admin/components/Fields.vue Updated color-picker to use v-model with enhanced validation and default handling in setCustomColor. Introduced ref attributes for better field manipulation.
templates/products/edit-product-single.php, templates/products/products-listing-row.php Added hooks dokan_before_product_edit_status_label, dokan_after_product_edit_status_label, and dokan_edit_product_after_view_product_button for customization. Refactored product type rendering logic to assign HTML snippets to a variable and use apply_filters for extensibility.
src/admin/pages/Settings.vue, src/utils/Mixin.js Added ref attributes to fields and implemented a scroll listener for dynamic navigation. Introduced scrollToSettingField method to facilitate scrolling to specific fields based on events.
templates/global/dashboard-nav.php Updated $allowedposttags to include new entries for svg and path tags with specified attributes for improved HTML sanitization.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

QA approved, :+1: Dev Review Done, Upcoming Release

Suggested reviewers

  • shohag121
  • mrabbani

Poem

🐇 In fields of code, where changes bloom,
A button brightens, dispelling gloom.
Colors now dance, with defaults to share,
As hooks invite custom flair.
With each small tweak, our app takes flight,
Hopping towards a future bright! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7186187 and 0b1bd47.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • assets/src/less/products.less (3 hunks)
  • includes/Product/Hooks.php (1 hunks)
  • src/admin/components/Fields.vue (3 hunks)
  • templates/products/edit-product-single.php (1 hunks)
  • templates/products/products-listing-row.php (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • includes/Product/Hooks.php
Additional comments not posted (6)
templates/products/products-listing-row.php (1)

107-132: LGTM! Improved readability and maintainability.

The refactoring of product type rendering into a single variable $product_type enhances readability and maintainability. The use of apply_filters is well-documented.

assets/src/less/products.less (2)

1277-1279: LGTM! Improved alignment and presentation of the delete action button.

The changes to the .action-delete class on hover improve the alignment and presentation.


556-558: LGTM! Improved alignment and presentation of the delete action button.

The changes to the .action-delete class on hover improve the alignment and presentation.

Verification successful

LGTM! Improved alignment and presentation of the delete action button.

The changes to the .action-delete class on hover improve the alignment and presentation without adversely impacting other elements.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of changes to the `.action-delete` class on other elements.

# Test: Search for the `.action-delete` class usage. Expect: No adverse impact on other elements.
rg --type less -A 5 $'.action-delete'

Length of output: 2049

templates/products/edit-product-single.php (2)

166-174: LGTM! New hook enhances extensibility.

The addition of the dokan_after_product_edit_status_label hook enhances extensibility and customization. The documentation is clear and helpful.

Verification successful

Verification successful.

The dokan_after_product_edit_status_label hook is correctly introduced and documented in the templates/products/edit-product-single.php file. It enhances extensibility and customization as intended.

  • File: templates/products/edit-product-single.php
  • Line: 166
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new `dokan_after_product_edit_status_label` hook.

# Test: Search for the usage of the new hook. Expect: Proper usage in the codebase.
rg --type php -A 5 $'do_action( \'dokan_after_product_edit_status_label\''

Length of output: 190


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new `dokan_after_product_edit_status_label` hook.

# Test: Search for the usage of the new hook. Expect: Proper usage in the codebase.
rg --type php -A 5 "do_action\( 'dokan_after_product_edit_status_label'"

Length of output: 779


151-159: LGTM! New hook enhances extensibility.

The addition of the dokan_before_product_edit_status_label hook enhances extensibility and customization. The documentation is clear and helpful.

Verification successful

LGTM! New hook enhances extensibility.

The addition of the dokan_before_product_edit_status_label hook enhances extensibility and customization. The documentation is clear and helpful. The hook is correctly added and ready for future use.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new `dokan_before_product_edit_status_label` hook.

# Test: Search for the usage of the new hook. Expect: Proper usage in the codebase.
rg --type php -A 5 $'do_action( \'dokan_before_product_edit_status_label\''

Length of output: 192


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new `dokan_before_product_edit_status_label` hook.

# Test: Search for the usage of the new hook. Expect: Proper usage in the codebase.
rg --type php -A 5 "do_action\( 'dokan_before_product_edit_status_label'"

Length of output: 728

src/admin/components/Fields.vue (1)

283-284: LGTM! But verify the usage of fieldData.default.

The changes to use v-model for two-way data binding and the addition of fieldData.default to the @custom-change event handler improve the robustness of the color selection process.

However, ensure that fieldData.default is properly defined and used throughout the codebase.

Comment on lines 920 to 928
setCustomColor( value, key, defaultValue ) {
if ( ! key ) {
return;
}
this.fieldData[ key ] = value;
// Regular expression to validate hex color code
const hexPattern = /^#([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/;
this.fieldData[ key ] = hexPattern.test( value ) ? value : defaultValue;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! But consider improving the regular expression.

The changes to include defaultValue and validate the color input against a regular expression for hex color codes enhance the robustness of the color selection process.

However, consider improving the regular expression to also support shorthand hex codes with alpha transparency.

-  const hexPattern = /^#([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/;
+  const hexPattern = /^#([A-Fa-f0-9]{8}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{4}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/;
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
setCustomColor( value, key, defaultValue ) {
if ( ! key ) {
return;
}
this.fieldData[ key ] = value;
// Regular expression to validate hex color code
const hexPattern = /^#([A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/;
this.fieldData[ key ] = hexPattern.test( value ) ? value : defaultValue;
// Regular expression to validate hex color code
const hexPattern = /^#([A-Fa-f0-9]{8}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{6}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{4}|[A-Fa-f0-9]{3})$/;
this.fieldData[ key ] = hexPattern.test( value ) ? value : defaultValue;

…ith-printful-module

# Conflicts:
#	templates/products/products-listing-row.php
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b1bd47 and e088cd2.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • templates/products/products-listing-row.php (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • templates/products/products-listing-row.php

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e088cd2 and 359309e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • templates/products/products-listing-row.php (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • templates/products/products-listing-row.php

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 359309e and 9e2cfa0.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/admin/components/Fields.vue (21 hunks)
  • src/admin/pages/Settings.vue (3 hunks)
  • src/utils/Mixin.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
src/utils/Mixin.js (1)

32-34: Addition of scrollToSettingField method looks good.

The method correctly emits an event to facilitate scrolling to a specific setting field, enhancing user interaction.

src/admin/pages/Settings.vue (2)

61-61: Use of ref attribute in Fields component.

The addition of the ref attribute facilitates direct DOM access, which can be useful for scrolling and other interactions.


585-602: Implementation of scrollToSettingField event listener.

The event listener is well-implemented, ensuring that the correct section is activated and the field is scrolled into view. The use of this.$nextTick() ensures that DOM updates are complete before scrolling.

src/admin/components/Fields.vue (3)

4-4: Addition of ref attributes to field components.

The ref attributes allow for direct DOM access, which is beneficial for operations like scrolling and focusing. This change enhances the component's interactivity.

Also applies to: 13-13, 46-46, 76-76, 100-100, 141-141, 167-167, 187-187, 210-210, 252-252, 276-276, 296-296, 307-307, 325-325, 344-344, 358-358, 386-386, 417-417, 445-445


706-708: Method scrollIntoField correctly utilizes scrollToSettingField.

The method effectively triggers scrolling to a specific field, improving navigation within the settings.


1245-1258: Styling for warning links is well-structured.

The CSS ensures that the warning links are styled consistently and are accessible. The use of pseudo-classes improves user interaction.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9e2cfa0 and a7c693f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • includes/Order/Manager.php (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
includes/Order/Manager.php (1)

932-932: Verify the impact of removing the conditional check for REST_REQUEST.

The removal of the conditional check for the REST_REQUEST constant broadens the circumstances under which the dokan_checkout_update_order_meta action is triggered. Ensure that this change does not introduce unintended side effects or performance issues.

Run the following script to verify the impact of the change:

…ith-printful-module' into enhance/ensure-compatibility-with-printful-module
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7c693f and d3bcc8b.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • includes/functions-dashboard-navigation.php (1 hunks)
  • templates/products/edit-product-single.php (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
includes/functions-dashboard-navigation.php (1)

281-284: LGTM!

The addition of the target attribute to the anchor (<a>) tag enhances the functionality by allowing the navigation links to specify how they should open. The change is backward-compatible as it defaults to _self if the target is not provided.

The code changes are approved.

templates/products/edit-product-single.php (3)

152-159: LGTM!

The hook dokan_before_product_edit_status_label is correctly implemented and enhances the extensibility of the product editing interface by allowing custom content insertion before the product status label.

The code changes are approved.


167-174: LGTM!

The hook dokan_after_product_edit_status_label is correctly implemented and enhances the extensibility of the product editing interface by allowing custom content insertion after the product status label.

The code changes are approved.


187-195: LGTM!

The hook dokan_edit_product_after_view_product_button is correctly implemented and enhances the extensibility of the product editing interface by allowing custom content insertion after the view product button.

The code changes are approved.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3bcc8b and 927b523.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • templates/products/products-listing-row.php (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
templates/products/products-listing-row.php (2)

102-106: LGTM!

The code is correctly implemented and adheres to WordPress coding standards.

The code changes are approved.


228-253: LGTM!

The code is correctly implemented and enhances readability and maintainability by centralizing the HTML construction for product types. The use of apply_filters function allows for greater extensibility and customization.

The code changes are approved.

Copy link
Member

@shohag121 shohag121 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You've done a great job, @devAsadNur and @MdAsifHossainNadim Bhai! It just needs a little bit of fine-tuning.

@shohag121 shohag121 added Needs: Testing This requires further testing Needs: Author Reply labels Sep 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
includes/Order/Manager.php (1)

Line range hint 1-938: Consider refactoring for improved modularity and testability

The Manager class handles multiple responsibilities related to order management. While it's well-structured, there might be room for improvement in terms of modularity and testability.

Consider the following suggestions:

  1. Split the class into smaller, more focused classes. For example, separate classes for sub-order creation, coupon handling, and order splitting.
  2. Use dependency injection for external dependencies (e.g., WooCommerce functions) to improve testability.
  3. Add more inline documentation, especially for complex methods like maybe_split_orders, to explain the logic and any important considerations.
  4. Consider creating a configuration class or using constants for frequently used values (e.g., table names, meta keys) to improve maintainability.

These changes could make the code more modular, easier to test, and simpler to maintain in the long run.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 927b523 and 5014f1b.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • assets/src/less/products.less (3 hunks)
  • includes/Order/Manager.php (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
assets/src/less/products.less (4)

557-559: Improved alignment for delete action button

The changes to the delete action button styling enhance its appearance and alignment. By switching to a flex display and centering the content both vertically and horizontally, the button's content will be perfectly centered, improving the overall user interface.


1279-1281: Consistent styling for delete action button in product edit area

These changes mirror the improvements made earlier, ensuring consistent styling of the delete action button across different parts of the product management interface. This consistency enhances the overall user experience and maintains a cohesive design.


1552-1554: Unified delete action button styling across the interface

These changes complete the consistent application of the improved delete action button styling throughout the interface, including the add new product popup. This global consistency in design enhances usability and provides a polished look across all product management areas.


Line range hint 557-1554: Summary: Enhanced delete button styling across product management interface

The changes in this file consistently improve the styling of delete action buttons throughout the product management interface. By using flex display and centering properties, the buttons now have better alignment and a more polished appearance. This consistency across different areas (product images, product edit area, and add new product popup) contributes to a more cohesive and professional user interface.

These modifications enhance the overall user experience without introducing any apparent issues or conflicts with existing styles.

includes/Order/Manager.php (1)

Line range hint 1-938: Summary: Removal of REST API check and suggestions for improvement

The main change in this file is the removal of the REST_REQUEST check in the maybe_split_orders method. This change simplifies the logic but may have implications for how orders are processed in different contexts.

Key points:

  1. The removal of the REST API check needs thorough testing to ensure it doesn't introduce unintended side effects.
  2. The Manager class, while well-structured, could benefit from refactoring for improved modularity and testability.
  3. Consider adding more inline documentation, especially for complex methods.

Overall, while the change itself is small, it's part of a critical order management system. Ensure comprehensive testing is performed, particularly around order splitting in various scenarios, to maintain the integrity of the order processing logic.

if ( defined( 'REST_REQUEST' ) ) {
do_action( 'dokan_checkout_update_order_meta', $parent_order_id, $seller_id );
}
do_action( 'dokan_checkout_update_order_meta', $parent_order_id, $seller_id );
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Removal of conditional check for REST_REQUEST

The conditional check for REST_REQUEST has been removed from the do_action call. This change means that the dokan_checkout_update_order_meta action will now be triggered for all requests, not just REST API requests.

Consider the implications of this change:

  1. Performance: This action will now be called more frequently. Ensure that the hooked functions are optimized for performance.
  2. Compatibility: Verify that all functions hooked to this action are safe to run in non-REST contexts.
  3. Consistency: Make sure this change aligns with the intended behavior across the entire plugin.

If the intention is to always trigger this action regardless of the request type, this change is appropriate. However, if there was a specific reason for the REST API check, you might want to reconsider this change or add a comment explaining why it was removed.

Comment on lines 932 to 938
$parent_order->update_meta_data( '_dokan_vendor_id', $seller_id );
$parent_order->save();

// if the request is made from rest api then insert the order data to the sync table
if ( defined( 'REST_REQUEST' ) ) {
do_action( 'dokan_checkout_update_order_meta', $parent_order_id, $seller_id );
}
do_action( 'dokan_checkout_update_order_meta', $parent_order_id, $seller_id );

return;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Additional instances of REST_REQUEST found that may require updates

The removal of the REST_REQUEST check in includes/Order/Manager.php is also present in the following files:

  • includes/Order/Hooks.php
  • includes/Registration.php
  • includes/REST/OrderController.php

Ensure that similar changes are applied consistently across these files to maintain uniform behavior.

Analysis chain

Verify impact on order splitting logic

The removal of the REST_REQUEST check may affect the behavior of the maybe_split_orders method. This change could potentially impact how orders are processed and split, especially in non-REST contexts.

To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects:

  1. Test the order splitting functionality in both REST and non-REST contexts.
  2. Verify that sub-orders are created correctly in all scenarios.
  3. Check if this change affects any other parts of the system that might depend on the previous behavior.

Run the following script to find other occurrences of REST_REQUEST in the codebase, which might need similar updates:

This will help identify any other places where similar changes might be needed for consistency.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of REST_REQUEST in PHP files
rg --type php "REST_REQUEST"

Length of output: 265

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
templates/global/dashboard-nav.php (1)

18-31: Overall: SVG support successfully added, implement robust sanitization.

The changes to $allowedposttags successfully add support for SVG and path elements in the dashboard, aligning with the PR objective of enhancing compatibility. This addition will likely improve the visual appeal and functionality of the dashboard.

However, it's crucial to implement robust sanitization for all SVG-related user inputs to prevent potential XSS vulnerabilities. Consider the following recommendations:

  1. Implement a dedicated SVG sanitization function that validates and cleans SVG input.
  2. Use this function to process any user-supplied SVG content before rendering.
  3. Consider using a trusted SVG sanitization library if available for your stack.
  4. Add unit tests to verify the effectiveness of your SVG sanitization process.

By following these recommendations, you can maintain the enhanced functionality while ensuring the security of the dashboard.

assets/src/less/site-navigation.less (1)

37-40: LGTM! Consider using a relative unit for better responsiveness.

The addition of margin-right to SVG elements improves the spacing and consistency with icon fonts in the menu items. This change enhances the overall readability and visual appeal of the navigation menu.

To improve responsiveness across different screen sizes, consider using a relative unit like em or rem instead of a fixed pixel value. For example:

 svg {
-  margin-right: 15px;
+  margin-right: 1em;
 }

This change would make the spacing more adaptable to different font sizes and screen resolutions.

templates/products/products-listing-row.php (1)

246-254: LGTM: Added filter for product type with documentation

The addition of the dokan_product_listing_product_type filter with accompanying documentation improves extensibility and code clarity. This change allows for easier customization of product type display.

Consider replacing the DOKAN_PRO_SINCE placeholder in the documentation with the actual version number where this feature was introduced. This will provide more accurate information for developers using this filter.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5014f1b and 8dd877f.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • assets/src/less/site-navigation.less (1 hunks)
  • templates/global/dashboard-nav.php (1 hunks)
  • templates/products/products-listing-row.php (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
templates/global/dashboard-nav.php (1)

28-31: Approved: Path element support added, maintain security vigilance.

The addition of the 'path' element and its attributes ('d' and 'fill') to $allowedposttags is consistent with the SVG support added earlier. This change further enhances the capability to use SVG graphics in the dashboard.

As with the SVG element, be vigilant about security. The 'd' attribute of the path element can potentially be used for XSS attacks if not properly sanitized. Ensure that any user-supplied path data is thoroughly validated before use.

To verify the usage of path elements within SVGs in the dashboard, run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for path elements within SVGs in PHP files

# Test: Look for path elements within SVG tags in PHP files
rg --type php -e '<svg.*?>(.*?<path.*?>.*?</svg>)' -U
assets/src/less/site-navigation.less (1)

Line range hint 1-424: Verify alignment with PR objectives: Printful module compatibility

While the change improves the visual consistency of the navigation menu, it's not immediately clear how this relates to the stated PR objective of enhancing compatibility with the Printful module.

Could you please clarify how this style change contributes to the Printful module compatibility? If it's not directly related, consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind this change in the context of the PR objectives.

Additionally, to ensure comprehensive compatibility, you may want to run the following script to check for any Printful-related hooks or functions that might need adjustment:

This will help identify any areas that might need attention for full Printful compatibility.

✅ Verification successful

Verified: No Printful-related references found in the codebase.

The style changes in assets/src/less/site-navigation.less enhance the visual consistency of the navigation menu but do not appear to directly contribute to the PR objective of enhancing compatibility with the Printful module. Please ensure that all changes align with the PR goals or provide additional context to clarify their relevance.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for Printful-related code that might need updates

# Test: Look for Printful-related hooks, functions, or comments
rg --type php -i '(printful|hook.*printful|function.*printful|//.*printful)'

# Test: Check for any TODO comments related to Printful integration
rg --type php '(TODO|FIXME).*printful'

Length of output: 119


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Comprehensive search for Printful-related code across all file types

# Test: Search for 'printful' in all files, case-insensitive
rg -i 'printful'

# Test: Search for any TODO or FIXME comments related to Printful in all files
rg -i '(TODO|FIXME).*printful'

Length of output: 49

templates/products/products-listing-row.php (3)

102-106: LGTM: Improved HTML formatting for product title

The restructuring of the product title HTML improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality. This change aligns with good coding practices for HTML formatting.


228-243: LGTM: Enhanced modularity in product type rendering

The changes improve code modularity by assigning product type HTML to a variable before output. This approach allows for easier modification and filtering of the product type display, enhancing the flexibility of the code without altering its core functionality.


261-263: LGTM: Minor documentation update

The update to the parameter description for the dokan_product_list_table_after_column_content_type action hook improves consistency in the documentation style. This minor change doesn't affect functionality but contributes to overall code consistency.

Comment on lines +18 to +27
$allowedposttags['svg'] = [ // phpcs:ignore
'fill' => [],
'role' => [],
'xmlns' => [],
'width' => [],
'height' => [],
'viewbox' => [],
'focusable' => [],
'aria-hidden' => [],
];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Potential XSS Vulnerabilities from SVG Usage

Multiple instances of <svg> tags have been detected in the codebase. Ensure that all SVG content is properly sanitized to prevent XSS vulnerabilities.

  • includes/Tracker.php
  • includes/Customizer.php
  • includes/Admin/Menu.php
🔗 Analysis chain

Approved: SVG support added, but ensure proper sanitization.

The addition of SVG attributes to $allowedposttags is appropriate for supporting SVG content in the dashboard. This change aligns with the PR objective of enhancing compatibility.

However, be cautious when allowing SVG tags, as they can potentially introduce XSS vulnerabilities if not properly sanitized. Ensure that any user-supplied SVG content is thoroughly validated and sanitized before rendering.

To verify the usage of SVG elements in the dashboard, run the following script:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for SVG usage in PHP files

# Test: Look for SVG elements in PHP files
rg --type php '<svg' -C 3

Length of output: 13990

@shohag121 shohag121 added Dev Review Done and removed Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval labels Nov 8, 2024
@shohag121 shohag121 merged commit 6c437d5 into develop Nov 8, 2024
@shohag121 shohag121 deleted the enhance/ensure-compatibility-with-printful-module branch November 8, 2024 10:09
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 29, 2025
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Dev Review Done Needs: Testing This requires further testing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants