Switch to org.getlantern

[leahxschmidt]

Since we don't actually own lantern.org

[ghostdance]

I get this, but, since lantern.org is owned by a Wharton School alumni organization, I don't think the potential for conflicts is high.

[lanterndev]

I think this was more at Joel Orlina's behest than out of fear that Wharton School alums would soon be vying for our namespace, but you never know.

[myleshorton]

We already do this.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, skivvies notifications@github.com wrote:

I think this was more at Joel Orlina's behesthttps://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=148925#comment-148925than out of fear that Wharton School alums would soon by vying for our
namespace, but you never know.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/549#issuecomment-15127887
.

Adam
pgp A998 2B6E EF1C 373E 723F A813 045D A255 901A FD89

[lanterndev]

Looks like our package namespace is still "org.lantern" in all our source files.

[myleshorton]

I was referring to sonatype.

On Tuesday, March 19, 2013, skivvies wrote:

Looks like our package namespace is still "org.lantern" in all our source
files.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/549#issuecomment-15129137
.

Sent from Gmail Mobile

[lanterndev]

Oh, I thought we'd already done that by the time Leah opened this ticket and this was about changing it in our source, sorry for the misunderstanding. If not, we can close this, but I think it was?

[myleshorton]

Not sure.

On Tuesday, March 19, 2013, skivvies wrote:

Oh, I thought we'd already done that by the time Leah opened this ticket
and this was about changing it in our source, sorry for the
misunderstanding. If not, we can close this, but I think it was?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/549#issuecomment-15130377
.

Sent from Gmail Mobile

[leahxschmidt]

We should probably change it in our source, but if that turns out to be too much of a hassle, I guess we could not.

[cholmes]

Closing, if anyone feels strongly then reopen.