Skip to content

Conversation

@liuzicheng1987
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @liuzicheng1987, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've refactored the error message generation within the validator classes to utilize std::stringstream instead of std::to_string and direct string concatenation. This change aims to improve the clarity and potentially the efficiency of how error messages are constructed. Additionally, I've introduced a new test case to ensure that validation with fields continues to function as expected.

Highlights

  • Error Message Refactoring: Switched from using std::to_string and string concatenation to std::stringstream for building detailed error messages in validator classes like EqualTo, Minimum, Maximum, etc.
  • Code Readability and Maintainability: The adoption of std::stringstream enhances the readability and maintainability of the error message construction logic, especially for more complex messages.
  • New Test Coverage: Added a new test file, tests/json/test_validation_with_fields.cpp, to specifically cover scenarios involving validation with fields, ensuring the robustness of the validator system.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the validation error message generation in rfl::comparisons.hpp to use std::stringstream instead of string concatenation, which is a good improvement for performance and type safety. A new test file is also added to cover validation on struct fields. My review includes a few suggestions for the new test file to improve its correctness and remove redundant code. I've also suggested an alternative approach using std::format for string building in comparisons.hpp, which could be even more efficient and readable if your toolchain supports C++20.

@liuzicheng1987 liuzicheng1987 merged commit 3dc74c9 into main Aug 7, 2025
287 of 288 checks passed
@liuzicheng1987 liuzicheng1987 deleted the f/validation_with_fields branch August 31, 2025 19:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants