Add GOVERNANCE file#1284
Conversation
carolynvs
force-pushed
the
governance
branch
from
d75ced1 to
f044750
Compare
This explains how the project governs itself today without attempting to introduce any language that we didn't already have existing. Over time we can iterate and improve upon it in follow-on pull requests. I want to get this in without modifying our existing goverance for our inclusion into the CNCF. Signed-off-by: Carolyn Van Slyck <me@carolynvanslyck.com>
carolynvs
force-pushed
the
governance
branch
from
f044750 to
3d47017
Compare
vdice
left a comment
vdice
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A few minor notes; otherwise LGTM!
* Fix typo * Link to sandbox Co-authored-by: Vaughn Dice <vadice@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Carolyn Van Slyck <me@carolynvanslyck.com>
carolynvs
force-pushed
the
governance
branch
from
9a09efa to
61b5b35
Compare
| * Maintainer | ||
| * Admin | ||
|
|
||
| The [OWNERS] defines the current maintainers of the project. |
|
|
||
| ## Roles | ||
|
|
||
| We have a [Contribution Ladder] that explains the capabilities and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Somewhere here should say explicitly that the contributor ladder includes the steps to progress to different roles (in other words, that this is the place to find out how to become a maintainer).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Right now this makes it sound like the contribution ladder file just explains what the different roles and responsibilities are.
iennae
left a comment
iennae
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I did add some comments but not required updates.
Signed-off-by: Carolyn Van Slyck <me@carolynvanslyck.com>
|
Thanks @iennae I've incorporated your feedback into the PR. I will merge as soon as I have Jeremy's 👍. After that we can improve as we go in follow-on PRs. Apologies for the speed, just trying to put a bow on the CNCF transition stuff. |
jeremyrickard
left a comment
jeremyrickard
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To me, Looks Good.
/lgtm
5 participants
What does this change
This explains how the project governs itself today without attempting to introduce any language that we didn't already have existing. Over time we can iterate and improve upon it in follow-on pull requests. I want to get this in without modifying our existing goverance for our inclusion into the CNCF.
What issue does it fix
Closes #1256
Notes for the reviewer
N/A
Checklist