When asked to look at comments on a PR, the agent only queries the issue-comment stream (gh pr view --json comments / issues/{id}/comments), which returns regular PR conversation comments. It does not query PR review comments (pulls/{id}/reviews and pulls/{id}/comments), which is where inline code review feedback and bot review comments live (e.g. Cursor Bugbot, CodeRabbit, Sentry's own bots).
Observed behavior:
- User asked to look at the "sentry bot comment" on a PR
- Agent found only the Vercel deployment bot (a regular comment) and reported on that
- The actual review comment from Cursor Bugbot — flagging a real broken-link bug — was in the review comments API surface and went unseen
- User had to paste the exact review comment URL before the agent checked the right endpoint
Impact: Misses actionable review feedback, wastes a round-trip, and looks like the agent isn't reading the PR.
Likely fix areas:
- The github-code skill's PR inspection path should query both comment streams when asked to look at PR comments
- When the user references a specific bot and the found comments don't match, the agent should widen the search to review comments before concluding
Action taken on behalf of Michi Hoffmann.
When asked to look at comments on a PR, the agent only queries the issue-comment stream (
gh pr view --json comments/issues/{id}/comments), which returns regular PR conversation comments. It does not query PR review comments (pulls/{id}/reviewsandpulls/{id}/comments), which is where inline code review feedback and bot review comments live (e.g. Cursor Bugbot, CodeRabbit, Sentry's own bots).Observed behavior:
Impact: Misses actionable review feedback, wastes a round-trip, and looks like the agent isn't reading the PR.
Likely fix areas:
Action taken on behalf of Michi Hoffmann.