Skip to content

Conversation

@Dav1dde
Copy link
Member

@Dav1dde Dav1dde commented Nov 7, 2025

The Redis pools are still sized without considering async pool concurrency. We're no longer in a Redis connection per thread world, we now have an additional pool concurrency to consider.

This increases right sizes the internal Redis pools with the total (worst case) concurrency in mind.

@Dav1dde Dav1dde requested a review from a team as a code owner November 7, 2025 16:44
@Dav1dde Dav1dde force-pushed the dav1d/redis-pool-size branch from 9598825 to eab0d4b Compare November 7, 2025 16:45
@Dav1dde Dav1dde self-assigned this Nov 7, 2025
@Dav1dde Dav1dde force-pushed the dav1d/redis-pool-size branch 2 times, most recently from 580326d to e983559 Compare November 7, 2025 16:55
@Dav1dde Dav1dde force-pushed the dav1d/redis-pool-size branch from e983559 to c66649a Compare November 7, 2025 16:56
@Dav1dde Dav1dde added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit ff0290d Nov 10, 2025
28 checks passed
@Dav1dde Dav1dde deleted the dav1d/redis-pool-size branch November 10, 2025 07:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants