Skip to content

Conversation

@lforst
Copy link
Contributor

@lforst lforst commented Jan 7, 2025

DESCRIBE YOUR PR

We had a comment that it was unclear whether the tree shaking step when adding a custom worker script for replay was optional.

getsentry/sentry-javascript#14794 (reply in thread)

IS YOUR CHANGE URGENT?

Help us prioritize incoming PRs by letting us know when the change needs to go live.

  • Urgent deadline (GA date, etc.):
  • Other deadline:
  • None: Not urgent, can wait up to 1 week+

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 7, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sentry-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 8, 2025 10:02am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
changelog ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 8, 2025 10:02am
develop-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 8, 2025 10:02am

@lforst lforst requested a review from mydea January 7, 2025 10:16
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Bundle Report

Changes will decrease total bundle size by 15 bytes (-0.0%) ⬇️. This is within the configured threshold ✅

Detailed changes
Bundle name Size Change
sentry-docs-server-cjs 10.37MB 9 bytes (-0.0%) ⬇️
sentry-docs-client-array-push 9.28MB 6 bytes (-0.0%) ⬇️

Copy link
Contributor

@coolguyzone coolguyzone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Thanks for the clarification 🤙

Co-authored-by: Alex Krawiec <alex.krawiec@sentry.io>
@lforst lforst merged commit c4c936f into master Jan 8, 2025
11 checks passed
@lforst lforst deleted the lforst-clarify-worker-tree-shaking branch January 8, 2025 10:20
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants