vitest/browser + nuxt | `Failed to resolve entry for package "@sentry/nuxt"`

[OrbisK]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have checked for existing issues https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/issues
• I have reviewed the documentation https://docs.sentry.io/
• I am using the latest SDK release https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/releases

How do you use Sentry?

Sentry Saas (sentry.io)

Which SDK are you using?

@sentry/nuxt

SDK Version

10.22.0

Framework Version

Nuxt: 4.1.3

Link to Sentry event

No response

Reproduction Example/SDK Setup

import * as Sentry from '@sentry/nuxt'

Sentry.init({
  enabled: false,
})

Steps to Reproduce

1. clone https://github.com/OrbisK/test-utils-fork/tree/reproduction-sentry-nuxt
2. switch to branch reproduction-sentry-nuxt
3. pnpm i
4. cd examples/app-vitest-browser
5. pnpm test

Expected Result

No internal server error

Actual Result

3:29:10 PM [vite] Internal server error: Failed to resolve entry for package "@sentry/nuxt". The package may have incorrect main/module/exports specified in its package.json: No known conditions for "." specifier in "@sentry/nuxt" package
  Plugin: vite:import-analysis
  File: examples/app-vitest-browser/sentry.client.config.ts:1:24
  1  |  import * as Sentry from "@sentry/nuxt";
     |                           ^
  2  |  Sentry.init({
  3  |    // If set up, you can use your runtime config here

Additional Context

maybe related to #16120

_{Tip: React with 👍 to help prioritize this issue. Please use comments to provide useful context, avoiding +1 or me too, to help us triage it.}

[linear]

JS-1104

[logaretm]

I created a PR to add a default fallback in general, but it happens because environment is set to nuxt, is this a convention to expect in the Nuxt ecosystem?

[OrbisK]

is this a convention to expect in the Nuxt ecosystem?

Yes, it is pretty common to use the nuxt runtime env for component testing. https://nuxt.com/docs/4.x/getting-started/testing#using-a-nuxt-runtime-environment