You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since b9031, it's now possible to generate bash-completions very quickly. --completion-bash already generates a different set of command line options for each executable. But it assigns the _llama_completions() function to all executables. I think each executable should generate its own completion function/script. Those can be aggregated into a single completion script, or remain separate scripts; packager's choice. I already started working on a patch, but I wanted to check if there is a reason to use a single completion function for all executables. Would you be interested in changing this?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Since b9031, it's now possible to generate
bash-completions very quickly.--completion-bashalready generates a different set of command line options for each executable. But it assigns the_llama_completions()function to all executables. I think each executable should generate its own completion function/script. Those can be aggregated into a single completion script, or remain separate scripts; packager's choice. I already started working on a patch, but I wanted to check if there is a reason to use a single completion function for all executables. Would you be interested in changing this?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions