-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
Q4/Q8 Tiled Gemm Optimization. #16999
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
shalinib-ibm
wants to merge
1
commit into
ggml-org:master
Choose a base branch
from
shalinib-ibm:q8_q4_opt
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be better to avoid dynamic allocations - none of the code currently uses those. The mechanism for this is to use the
wdatafromggml_compute_paramsto store scratch data. You'll need to reserve the worst-casewsizefor your case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ggerganov Thank you for the input. I tried to avoid dynamic allocation from the code, but lost perforamce without this pthread based code. Below is the code Performance comparison after integrating thread-local scratchpad using wdata.
wdata-based TLSThis regression is likely due to:
I have also tried static allocation on stack by having just this code , But it has suffers from similar perf loss. ( 38 t/s)
vec_t A_pack [mckc2];
vec_t B_pack[nckc2];
int comparray[mc*kc];
Can you please suggest ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You
wdatapointer has to take into account the thread ID. For example:llama.cpp/ggml/src/ggml-cpu/ops.cpp
Lines 615 to 617 in 7f09a68
From what I can tell from your codeblock, all threads are currently working on the same wdata range and most likely they are data racing. Unless I'm missing something 🤔