Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes issue in #2313 found by @FrenkelS which broke Elksdoom.
fmemcpynow saves DS (and ES for good measure). The same fix is applied tofmemcmp.Within Watcom ASM functions, it seems DS needs to be saved if altered, not sure whether ES needs saving or not. I haven't been able to generate any C code that depends on DS (or ES) being saved across a function call. Nonetheless, without saving DS in fmemcpy, Elksdoom crashes.
There seems to be some confusion in whether the segment registers should or must be saved across function calls; not sure whether this is a singular issue with Doom and ASM code, something required for all ASM functions mixed with C, or only required when mixing ASM functions with unknown ASM functions. The Open Watcom C User's Guide states that saving and restoring segment registers is not normally emitted by the C compiler unless the -Wc,-r option is set, and caution should be exercised, although the warning seems related to protected mode selectors only: