Skip to content

Conversation

@gitcoder89431
Copy link
Owner

@gitcoder89431 gitcoder89431 commented Aug 24, 2025

πŸ—οΈ Provider Configuration Foundation

Establishes the core architecture for managing LOCAL and OPENROUTER provider configurations with validation states and secure storage.

βœ… Core Foundation Features

Provider Configuration Types:

pub enum ProviderType { Local, OpenRouter }
pub struct ProviderConfig {
    pub provider_type: ProviderType,
    pub endpoint_url: Option<String>,  // For LOCAL
    pub api_key: Option<String>,       // For OPENROUTER  
    pub validation_status: ValidationStatus,
}

Validation System:

  • ValidationStatus: Unchecked β†’ Checking β†’ Valid βœ… / Invalid ❌
  • Visual status icons: βšͺπŸŸ‘βœ…βŒ
  • Async validation architecture ready

Settings Extension:

  • Extended Settings struct with local_provider and openrouter_provider
  • Provider navigation with selected_provider_index
  • Field focus management with focused_field: Option<ProviderField>

πŸ”’ Security Features

  • API Key Masking: sk-or-1234567890...345 (first 10 + last 3 chars)
  • Input Validation: URL format validation for local endpoints
  • Required Fields: At least one provider must be configured
  • Secure Storage: Architecture ready for encrypted persistence

🎯 Action System

Extended SettingsAction with provider operations:

pub enum SettingsAction {
    // Theme actions
    ChangeTheme(ThemeVariant),
    NavigateThemePrevious,
    NavigateThemeNext,
    
    // Provider actions  
    NavigateProviderPrevious,
    NavigateProviderNext,
    FocusField(ProviderField),
    UpdateField(ProviderField, String),
    ValidateProvider(ProviderType),
    SaveConfiguration,
}

πŸ§ͺ Quality Assurance

  • Testing: 10/10 tests passing βœ…

    • Provider config creation & updates
    • API key masking functionality
    • Validation rules and error handling
    • Navigation & field management
    • Security features
  • Code Quality:

    • Clippy clean βœ…
    • Properly formatted βœ…
    • Comprehensive documentation βœ…
  • Demo: Working example showcasing all features βœ…

🎨 Architecture Benefits

  • Extensible: Easy to add new provider types (Azure, AWS, etc.)
  • Secure: Sensitive data properly masked and validated
  • Testable: Comprehensive test coverage with clear assertions
  • Clean: Action-based state management with clear separation
  • Ready: Foundation supports async validation and UI integration

πŸš€ Next Steps Ready

This foundation prepares for:

  1. UI integration with settings modal
  2. Async provider validation
  3. Backend HTTP client implementation
  4. Configuration persistence
  5. Additional provider types

Closes #29

🎯 Foundation Features:
- ProviderType enum (Local, OpenRouter)
- ProviderConfig with validation status tracking
- Settings extension with provider management
- SettingsAction enum for provider operations
- Secure API key masking and validation

πŸ“‹ Data Structures:
- ValidationStatus: Unchecked β†’ Checking β†’ Valid/Invalid
- ProviderField: LocalEndpoint, OpenRouterApiKey
- Provider navigation and field focus management
- Clean separation between LOCAL and OPENROUTER configs

πŸ”’ Security Features:
- API key masking (show first 10 + last 3 chars)
- Input validation for URLs and keys
- Required field validation
- Extensible validation architecture

πŸ§ͺ Testing:
- 10/10 tests passing βœ…
- Provider config creation & updates βœ…
- API key masking βœ…
- Validation rules βœ…
- Navigation & field management βœ…
- Demo example working βœ…

πŸš€ Ready for UI Integration:
- Foundation supports async validation
- Clean action-based architecture
- Extensible for future providers
- Security-first design

Closes #29
- Run cargo fmt to format code according to Rust standards
- Clean up import formatting and line breaks
- Ensure CI formatting checks pass
@gitcoder89431 gitcoder89431 merged commit 3b336e6 into main Aug 24, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

πŸ—οΈ Provider Configuration Foundation

2 participants