feat: automated releases and auto labelling#99
Conversation
zkoppert
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think these releases may silently fail on major version changes since we aren't updating action.yaml files. That sound right to you? We can make that a future pr (set of prs) if desired.
yes, currently, we, as the PR reviewers, need to confirm the action.yml was updated if we're going to flag a PR with the Do you think this work is a major version bump? I haven't been doing that. 😬 |
Part of github/github-ospo#78 - [x] lint pr title adhering to conventional commits (helps with auto labelling) - [x] Update CONTRIBUTING.md - [x] automated releases - [x] how to file a bug report - [x] how to file an enhancement - [x] Update pull_request_template with new standard - [x] setup autolabelling through release-drafter github action config - [x] create auto-labeler workflow - [x] change release-drafter workflow to release - [x] create release, including new tag - [x] create discussion announcement based on release - [x] build container images, tag them and release them Manual Actions: - [x] create `revert` and `maintenance` labels - [x] put repository and category IDs into secrets for the discussion create action Signed-off-by: jmeridth <jmeridth@gmail.com>
e0911e9 to
2d1bfcf
Compare
|
No major bump needed for this one, just looking to the future. |
Part of github/github-ospo#78
Pull Request
Proposed Changes
Manual Actions:
revertandmaintenancelabelsReadiness Checklist
Author/Contributor
make lintand fix any issues that you have introducedmake testand ensure you have test coverage for the lines you are introducingReviewer
bug,documentation,enhancement,infrastructure, orbreaking