Added 2025/12/2025-12-08-source-code.md

[dmca-sync-bot]

This is an automated pull request to sync changes from upstream repository.

Diff summary:

A 2025/12/2025-12-08-source-code.md

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new DMCA takedown notice dated December 8, 2025, regarding alleged copyright infringement of proprietary Salesforce source code. The notice claims the repository at github.com/fotechv/SalesforceOrgProject is an unauthorized re-upload of previously removed infringing content.

• Adds DMCA takedown notice for Salesforce proprietary code infringement claim
• Documents request to remove entire repository fotechv/SalesforceOrgProject
• References prior DMCA action from December 4, 2025 against related content

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

There's a spacing issue in this line. "I am the [private] and copyright holder" should have proper formatting. However, more importantly, the phrase appears to be missing a word or role description between "the" and "and". Based on the context and similar DMCA notices, this might be intended to say "I am the [private] owner and copyright holder" or similar.

Suggested change

	I am the [private] and copyright holder of this source code. I am the [private] of the GitHub account '[private]'. This repository hosts an unauthorized copy of [private] proprietary Salesforce source code. This content is identical to the infringing material that GitHub Trust & Safety recently disabled on Dec 4, 2025 (in my previous DMCA notice regarding user '[private]').
	I am the [private] owner and copyright holder of this source code. I am the [private] of the GitHub account '[private]'. This repository hosts an unauthorized copy of [private] proprietary Salesforce source code. This content is identical to the infringing material that GitHub Trust & Safety recently disabled on Dec 4, 2025 (in my previous DMCA notice regarding user '[private]').

[Copilot]

[nitpick] The phrase "100% identical" is informal for a legal document. Consider using more precise legal language such as "substantially identical" or "materially identical" which are standard terms in copyright infringement claims.

Suggested change

The copyrighted work is [private] proprietary 'SalesforceOrgProject' source code. Although the user 'fotechv' has reset the git commit history to hide the original authorship (showing "fotechv first commit"), the file structure (folders: 'force-app/main/default', 'config', 'manifest', 'scripts') and the underlying code logic are 100% identical to the infringing content I previously reported. Since GitHub has already validated [private] ownership and removed the 'Sabrac' network, I request this re-uploaded copy be removed as well.

The copyrighted work is [private] proprietary 'SalesforceOrgProject' source code. Although the user 'fotechv' has reset the git commit history to hide the original authorship (showing "fotechv first commit"), the file structure (folders: 'force-app/main/default', 'config', 'manifest', 'scripts') and the underlying code logic are substantially identical to the infringing content I previously reported. Since GitHub has already validated [private] ownership and removed the 'Sabrac' network, I request this re-uploaded copy be removed as well.