The is:archived filter doesn't work as documented

[dannystaple]

Code of Conduct

• I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's Code of Conduct

What article on docs.github.com is affected?

https://docs.github.com/en/search-github/github-code-search/understanding-github-code-search-syntax#is-qualifier

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

The article suggests that the term is:archived can be used to search. However, this doesn't seem to work when seraching repos or issues (I've not tried it in other places). A NOT will clear all repos shown even though only one is archived.
However, the archived:true or archived:false filters do work in both repo and issue use cases, and should be documented here.
This also cross references with https://docs.github.com/en/search-github/searching-on-github/searching-issues-and-pull-requests#search-based-on-whether-a-repository-is-archived.

Additional information

No response

[nguyenalex836]

@dannystaple Thank you for opening this issue! ✨

However, this doesn't seem to work when seraching repos or issues (I've not tried it in other places).

Before we making changes to the docs, can you reach out to our support team to have them review this?

They would have the best insight on whether there are other factors affecting the expected behavior of that filter that we should include in any update to the docs 💛

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically closed because there has been no response to our request for more information from the original author. With only the information that is currently in the issue, we don't have enough information to take action. Please reach out if you have or find the answers we need so that we can investigate further. See this blog post on bug reports and the importance of repro steps for more information about the kind of information that may be helpful.