Update actions-billing.md#2137
Conversation
Without "both", I interpreted text as referring to just one category: "public repositories using self-hosted runners", which is not correct. You could also use an Oxford comma here :) but I think "both" is clearer.
|
Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines. |
|
@hwine Thanks so much for opening a PR! I'll get this triaged for review ⚡ |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 7 days with no activity and will be automatically closed in 3 days. To keep this PR open, update the PR by adding a comment or pushing a commit. |
|
Thanks for your patience! Our small team is working our way through reviewing all of the amazing contributions ✨ |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 7 days with no activity and will be automatically closed in 3 days. To keep this PR open, update the PR by adding a comment or pushing a commit. |
That's the flip side of community involvement :) Lots of extra admin time! (hoping this resets stale) |
|
This PR is stale because it has been open 7 days with no activity and will be automatically closed in 3 days. To keep this PR open, update the PR by adding a comment or pushing a commit. |
|
stale reset |
| @@ -1 +1 @@ | |||
| {% data variables.product.prodname_actions %} usage is free for public repositories and self-hosted runners. For private repositories, each {% data variables.product.prodname_dotcom %} account receives a certain amount of free minutes and storage, depending on the product used with the account. Any usage beyond the included amounts is controlled by spending limits. | |||
| {% data variables.product.prodname_actions %} usage is free for both public repositories and self-hosted runners. For private repositories, each {% data variables.product.prodname_dotcom %} account receives a certain amount of free minutes and storage, depending on the product used with the account. Any usage beyond the included amounts is controlled by spending limits. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👋 Hi, @hwine! Thanks a lot for this suggestion; I agree that this could be misunderstood.
I think we could probably clear this up a little more, because IIUC, self-hosted runner usage is free for private repositories, but only for minutes. Storage is still counted for any uploaded workflow artifacts from self-hosted runners. The current wording might incorrectly imply that if you use self-hosted runners in a private repository, any uploaded storage usage is also free.
| {% data variables.product.prodname_actions %} usage is free for both public repositories and self-hosted runners. For private repositories, each {% data variables.product.prodname_dotcom %} account receives a certain amount of free minutes and storage, depending on the product used with the account. Any usage beyond the included amounts is controlled by spending limits. | |
| {% data variables.product.prodname_actions %} usage is free for public repositories. For private repositories, each {% data variables.product.prodname_dotcom %} account receives a certain amount of free minutes and storage, depending on the product used with the account. Self-hosted runner usage is free, and is not counted as billable minutes. Any usage beyond the included amounts is controlled by spending limits. |
@chrispat Could you please confirm the wording ☝️ is ok?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One comment - I sure wouldn't know how to work it in smoothly - actions are not available for private repos on legacy plans. (I oversee a couple of those kind of orgs.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One comment - I sure wouldn't know how to work it in smoothly - actions are not available for private repos on legacy plans. (I oversee a couple of those kind of orgs.)
@hwine Thanks, but this is already mentioned in the purple product callout that is at the top of most docs pages for Actions 🙂 , e.g.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oh, duh. I have to remember to read the top matter even when I enter via a deep link.
lucascosti
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is ready to merge! 🎉
|
Thanks very much for contributing! Your pull request has been merged 🎉 You should see your changes appear on the site in approximately 24 hours. |

Without "both", I interpreted text as referring to just one category: "public repositories using self-hosted runners", which is not correct.
You could also use an Oxford comma here :) but I think "both" is clearer.
Why:
#2134 details the perceived ambiguity.
What's being changed:
Add a word.
Check off the following: