[Coverage Report] Test Coverage Report — 2026-07-28 #6698
Replies: 1 comment
|
🔮 The ancient spirits stir; the smoke test agent was here. The omens are recorded, and the run has been observed. Warning Firewall blocked 1 domainThe following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
network:
allowed:
- defaults
- "registry.npmjs.org"See Network Configuration for more information.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
📊 Test Coverage Report — 2026-07-28
Overall Coverage
Current Status: ✅ PASSING (all thresholds met)
Test Suites: 6 passed | Total Tests: 135 passed | Duration: ~4.4s
🛡️ Security-Critical Path Status
Security-critical modules govern domain filtering (Squid ACL), network isolation (iptables), and container lifecycle:
squid-config.tshost-iptables.tsdomain-patterns.tsdocker-manager.tscli.tsFinding: Squid proxy config (domain ACLs) and domain pattern matching are fully covered. Container lifecycle (
docker-manager.ts) has significant gaps but is not actively validating security policies — it only orchestrates execution.📋 Coverage Table
✅ Fully Covered (100%)
logger.tssquid-config.tscli-workflow.tshost-iptables.ts❌ Needs Improvement (<50%)
docker-manager.tscli.ts🔧 Function Audit
Fully Tested (100% function coverage):
Critical Untested Functions (High Risk):
cli.ts: Main CLI handler, signal handlers, exit code propagation — 0 functions testeddocker-manager.ts: 24 of 25 functions untested (~96% untested):📅 Recent Source Changes (last 7 days)
The codebase shows active maintenance across:
domain-patterns.ts,domain-validation.ts)container-lifecycle.ts,container-startup-diagnostics.ts)api-proxy-config*.tsfiles)logs/module,squid-log-reader.ts)Test Coverage Impact: Most new/modified files have corresponding
.test.tsfiles, indicating test-driven development. However, the comprehensive test suite grew without proportional coverage gains in the CLI entry point and container manager.🔎 Notable Findings
Domain Security Excellent:
squid-config.ts(domain ACLs),domain-patterns.ts(matching), anddomain-validation.tsare all 100% covered. The proxy filtering tier is robust.Network Isolation Good:
host-iptables.tsis 83.63% covered with all 5 core functions tested. Missing branch coverage (55.55%) is in edge cases (IPv6, error conditions) rather than the main DNAT rule setup.Container Lifecycle Gap:
docker-manager.ts(18%) controls container startup, health checks, and cleanup. The low coverage masks uncertainty in error handling and resource deallocation paths. This is an orchestration gap, not a filtering gap — firewall policies remain enforced by Squid and iptables.CLI Entry Point Untested:
cli.ts(0% coverage) handles signal interrupts (SIGINT/SIGTERM), exit code propagation, and config orchestration. No automated tests for graceful shutdown or error recovery at the CLI boundary.🎯 Recommendations
Priority: HIGH — Focus on entry point and orchestration reliability
[HIGH] Add
cli.tsIntegration Tests (~4–6 hours)[HIGH] Improve
docker-manager.tsError Paths (~5–7 hours)[MEDIUM] Complete
host-iptables.tsBranch Coverage (~2–3 hours)Summary: The firewall's filtering tier is production-ready (100% coverage on Squid ACLs, domain patterns). Orchestration tier needs hardening (CLI and container lifecycle at 0–18%). Recommend prioritizing entry point and error paths over incremental gains in well-tested modules.
Key Metric: Overall coverage trend is steady (38.39%, up 2.53% from baseline). Tests reach 135/135 passing. Recommend maintaining ≥38% while focusing on function coverage depth in security-critical and orchestration code.
All reactions