Repository navigation
[Coverage Report] Test Coverage Report — 2026-08-20 #7581
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-08-27T23:17:34.947Z.
|
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
📊 Test Coverage Report — 2026-08-20
Overall Coverage
Status: Strong overall coverage across all metrics. Statement and function coverage exceed 92%, demonstrating comprehensive test implementation.
🛡️ Security-Critical Path Status
Key Finding: All core security components (iptables rules, Squid proxy config, Docker management, domain filtering) have 100% statement coverage. The main entry point (cli.ts) has minor gaps (2 uncovered paths) that warrant investigation.
📋 Coverage Table
Files Under 70% Statement Coverage (Priority Review)
🔧 Function Audit
Complete Coverage (Security-Critical)
Partial Coverage (Needs Attention)
📅 Recent Source Changes (last 7 days)
1aed44ac47bfccfe9dd14d79988b4549a5e051292a6de3cb13098494🔎 Notable Findings
Security Coverage Excellence: All foundational security components (iptables, Squid, Docker, domain patterns) achieve 100% statement coverage with comprehensive branch coverage. The firewall's core security posture is well-tested.
Minimal Entry Point Gaps: Only 2 uncovered paths in
cli.ts(1 statement, 1 branch at 50%), affecting the main orchestration logic. These gaps should be addressed to ensure all CLI flag combinations are exercised.New Features Under-tested: Recent additions (Cloud Hypervisor, enclave features, API key injection) show 66–72% coverage, indicating active development. These areas should be prioritized for additional test coverage as features stabilize.
Critical Gap - finite-disclosure.ts: The
bounded-execution/finite-disclosure.tsmodule has only 9.26% coverage with 0.26% branch coverage. This appears to be either a new/stub module or a feature with minimal tests. Recommend investigation to determine if this represents a gap in test infrastructure or incomplete feature implementation.🎯 Recommendations
🔴 HIGH Priority
🟡 MEDIUM Priority
src/cloud-hypervisor/virtiofsd.ts(72.51% coverage)src/microvm/rootfs.ts(71.69% coverage)🟢 LOW Priority
src/commands/validators/config-assembly.tsandsrc/enclave/runtime-preflight.tshave 67–70% coverage. As these handle orchestration logic, expand tests to reach 85%+ before next release.src/host-iptables*,src/squid-config*, andsrc/docker-manager*modules in pre-commit hooks.All reactions